4 comments

[ 3.2 ms ] story [ 26.3 ms ] thread
All one has to do to validate this is to look at their own code to understand why it may look like slop.

Anytime a port, a prototype or any other beta/alpha version of a piece of software is coded, isn’t that what we as humans do already?

To say that a human is any better isn’t sound judgement or logical.

> To say that a human is any better isn’t sound judgement or logical.

For the old code base, there were humans that understood the code. There was a thought process for many things before they were added. Now, all this is lost and nobody knows the current code. And they can’t invest time to understand it, as Claude might rewrite things again. Now, only way to contribute reasonably is to pay tokens.

He's right. It's just transpiling and not even a good one.