6 comments

[ 0.20 ms ] story [ 3.9 ms ] thread
Another deepseek moment? it seems they have fully caught with fable tier of models, and this was a lot sooner than was expected.
This is a different link from the previous discussion; it's to the blog post, which wasn't online when the previous discussion started.

This is relevant because:

- The blog post is explicitly saying that the model is open; that language was removed from the previously shared link

- It shows benchmarks

I've been playing around with it for the past few hours, and I think it's an amazing model. I'm not sure I could tell the difference between this and Fable in a blind test. The quota in the $100 Kimi Coding plan seems to roughly align with what I get from the $200 Anthropic plan when I primarily use Fable.

They're saying kimi3 beat Fable in the AttnRes Kernel Optimization benchmark. What does this benchmark actually mean?