Wait, what? I didn't read everything because the writing kind of sucks: It buries the point in details and I didn't feel like going through with a fine comb to find the point.
AFAIU: Three artists hired three construction workers to dig random holes at a still un-fenced future Google datacenter construction site. The workers dug while the artists stood nearby doing artist things. Security came, then everyone left. There was much rejoicing.
This is bad art; both conceptually and because this prose description of it is verbose and boring to read. And because the subject is a Google datacenter, and because the author Dinnis van Dijken is a working artist, I'm concerned that this performance art is motivated by anti-datacenter political sentiment in some way, which I think is generally bad.
6 comments
[ 0.28 ms ] story [ 9.9 ms ] threadAFAIU: Three artists hired three construction workers to dig random holes at a still un-fenced future Google datacenter construction site. The workers dug while the artists stood nearby doing artist things. Security came, then everyone left. There was much rejoicing.