> While the US and EU patents around MPEG-4 Part 2 expired in recent years, until today there remained one patent still active in Brazil.
Since MPEG-this Part that is hard to keep straight, this is the MPEG standard backing Xvid and DivX codecs. So let's encode video and torrent like it's 2002!
I don't think video resolution will increase all that much in the future, except for niche uses, as the resolution of the human eye becomes a limiting factor.
It's so weird to look at the patents list for H.264 and see multiple patents granted after the H.264 specification was released. Was the situation similar for MPEG-4?
19 comments
[ 0.21 ms ] story [ 32.7 ms ] threadSince MPEG-this Part that is hard to keep straight, this is the MPEG standard backing Xvid and DivX codecs. So let's encode video and torrent like it's 2002!
Let's have a meet up a Circuit City!!
(Source: have written a H.263 decoder as a learning exercise.)
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Have_the_patents_for_H.264_M...
At which point, the continued march towards higher resolution and bandwidth video will probably limit their utility
Just as the patent system intended: maximum extraction was enabled while the product was useful.
For a lot of use cases, including Basic and Main profile, H.264 is already free.
Something tells me H264 is going to be sticking around for a while just on sheer compatibility and compute requirements
And, yes, I remember w32codecs until MPlayer's bundled set superseded them. And mencoder for sure ;)
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Have_the_patents_for_H.264_M...