FCC plans ID mandate that could block anonymous use of prepaid burner phones (arstechnica.com)

Comments are closed, but they're open for responses.

By my count there were 533 replies that were responsive to the 'enhanced' KYC requirements. ~496 opposing it, and ~37 substantively supporting it.

I used deepseek 4 flash with a rubric I wrote to run the responses against each other in a tournament.

Here are some of the stronger responses against:

* https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/search-filings/filing/261099...

* https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/search-filings/filing/261099...

* https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/search-filings/filing/105288...

* https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/search-filings/filing/261098...

* https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/search-filings/filing/261098...

* https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/search-filings/filing/261099...

* https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/search-filings/filing/261099... (mine)

* https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/search-filings/filing/106110...

And here are some of the stronger argument for, which you might want to rebut:

* https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/search-filings/filing/261099...

* https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/search-filings/filing/261099...

* https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/search-filings/filing/106090...

* https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/search-filings/filing/105150...

* https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/search-filings/filing/261098...

* https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/search-filings/filing/261099...

* https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/search-filings/filing/261099...

*