Launch HN: Unlayer (YC W22) – Add email and document builders to your app (unlayer.com)

56 points by adeelraza ↗ HN
Hi HN, We’re Adeel and Umair, co-founders of Unlayer (https://unlayer.com/). We let you add content creation to your applications without having to build an entire editor, renderer, template, and export stack yourself. Unlayer lets you create emails, web pages, and documents inside your app, in three different ways: in code, visually, or with AI.

Here’s a demo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0HsDtNkdMpM.

We started with an embeddable email editor because a lot of products eventually need one: CRMs, marketing tools, customer engagement platforms, marketplaces, internal tools, and vertical SaaS apps all run into this at some point. At first, it sounds like a small feature: "just" add a drag and drop editor. In practice, it turns into a big pain. You end up dealing with email rendering, Outlook quirks, responsive layouts, templates, merge tags, image uploads, exports, permissions, localization, versioning, and a long tail of edge cases that have nothing to do with your core product

Over time, we saw the same problem beyond email. Apps also need landing pages, invoices, proposals, reports, contracts, and PDFs. Some of this content is best created visually by end users. Some of it is better generated in code by developers. Increasingly, some of it is also generated by AI agents. Many teams eventually need all three workflows. That is the direction we have been working toward with Unlayer.

There are three parts we are showing today:

(1) Unlayer Elements. This is our open-source React component library for creating emails, pages, and documents in code (repo: https://github.com/unlayer/elements, more at https://unlayer.com/elements). Instead of hand-writing raw HTML templates, developers can compose content using React components, reuse sections like headers, footers, CTAs, invoice rows, and branded blocks, keep templates in Git, and render them into production output.

One newer use case we are seeing is AI-assisted content creation. If an AI agent is asked to create an email, invoice, report, or landing page, the output is usually raw HTML or markdown that becomes hard to maintain. With Elements, the agent can generate structured React components instead. A developer can review the result, refactor it, keep it in Git, and still pass the design into a visual builder later if someone needs to edit it.

(2) Visual Builder. This is the drag and drop editor (repo: https://github.com/unlayer/react-email-editor, more at https://unlayer.com/email-builder) that can be embedded inside an app so non-technical users can create or edit content. In the demo, we show the email builder and the AI assistant inside the builder. The goal is not to replace the developer workflow, but to connect it with a visual workflow when marketers, admins, customers, or internal teams need to make changes themselves.

(3) Document Builder. This is for structured documents such as proposals, reports, invoices, contracts, and PDFs. We have seen a lot of teams build separate systems for email templates, web pages, and document generation, even though the underlying primitives are similar: layout, content blocks, variables, assets, preview, export, and permissions. More: https://unlayer.com/document-builder

The technical challenge is making these workflows share a common foundation. Developers should be able to build templates in code when that makes sense. End users should be able to edit visually whe...

14 comments

[ 3.3 ms ] story [ 35.0 ms ] thread
Congrats on your late Launch HN. Everyone's going to ask this question but, in a world of AI/LLMs, why wouldn't I just build it myself in 10 min
Not the OP, nor do I have any relationship to them, but I've had to build or maintain plenty of these in my time and sure, an LLM can knock out a basic one easily, but there are so many edge cases that need to be accounted for that it gets complex quickly.

Congrats on the launch - this looks like a genuinely useful tool. I look forward to checking it out.

As a content creator, this intrigued me until I saw the AI-generated overview video front and center on the homepage. The subtext communicates that the product was designed for fake people standing in front of large fake touchscreens dragging fake elements around.
I was interested for a few seconds, until I saw that it's a SaaS.

Sorry, but that's a no-go at this point.

Congrats on the launch! Elements seems really useful and practical, what's the response been from builders so far?
Was ready to try this until I saw the launch video. It's pure AI slop.

If that's the first impression you're giving, you're underselling what looks like a legitimately useful product :(

If this can fully replace something like postmark plus do documents it could be very interesting. I might try it out in a year or so if it’s still around.
Vibe coded website that looks like it was one-shotted in 5 minutes. Doesn't even work on mobile, the copy wraps off the screen. How can we take you seriously?
FYI we've built this internally and it was a pain, so I was excited to check out what you've built to see if it was a good fit for us.

But your landing page + video was just slop city. Removes 100% of credibility for me.

I know the advice is launch early and often, but honestly I would just point people to the github until you have something better.

I think the key issue is not whether an LLM can make a 10-minute demo, but who maintains all the edge cases afterward: template state, email-safe HTML, export, permissions, custom blocks, and previews. Which part is usually the hardest for customers to integrate today?
Congrats on the launch, but don't mostly people use AI now for most of the ui and frontend tasks, why would they go through all of this if they can just ask AI?
Congrats on the launch, and welcome to HN. This is a real problem and it is good to see more teams taking it seriously. For a bit of context, and full disclosure that I am on the other side of this market: we built Beefree SDK around almost exactly this use case about ten years ago. We started with an embeddable email editor and expanded into popups and web pages over time, so the pain points you describe, Outlook quirks, merge tags, exports, versioning, localization, plus many others like security, scale, and collaborative editing, are all very familiar to us. I am not saying this to rain on your parade. The category has been maturing for a while now and there is genuinely room for good products in it. Honestly, HN was a big part of how we got off the ground in the early days. A launch post (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8474744) is a lot of why we were able to grow and develop at all, so I have real appreciation for founders sharing their work here. Happy to compare notes any time.
The interesting part to me is the boundary you’re drawing around AI output: agents generating structured React components that can be reviewed, versioned, and later opened in a visual builder, rather than another unowned HTML blob.

A practical launch follow-up would be to look for live conversations from teams building AI-assisted invoice, proposal, report, or email workflows and getting stuck on that handoff from generation to editable production content. With the Unlayer positioning and ideal user as input, racoonn.me can surface those timely Reddit/X threads and produce reply drafts that address the stated implementation problem before mentioning the relevant builder or Elements workflow.

That is not a substitute for docs or examples around the component model. It is the discovery-and-first-response layer for finding people who are already trying to solve the exact problem you describe.