Still, I do think Reddit definitely needs more alternatives because their moderation system is broken with power-tripping moderators, and the community admins don't want to do anything about it.
Totally agree. It was discovered that the main moderator of my local states sub Reddit actually lived in an adjacent state. When this was discovered, I found it very subversive as “how could a person living out of my own state moderate my neighbors opinions?“ Additionally, they would use posts history in a different but legally connected other subreddit as a main reason to ban you from their subreddit.
There is something deeply wrong with Reddit's moderation system. In many subreddits, moderatos seem to ban or reomve content simply because it doesn't align with their preferences. To top that, the built-in filters can be frustratingly aggressive. The questions is surely how to improve the content moderation in a different way.
It's weird for reddit clones to pretend they're anything but a small subreddit in scale. This site has a "discover" feature, "topics" (its own subreddits), "tuning" (huh?), user following, probably dms too, and it displays an extremely truncated version of every thread's top comment as you scroll by - so you don't waste your time going to the discussion page?
All of these features result in atomization of an already tiny content pool. This is the opposite of what you need to jumpstart a reddit clone. This is a mental exercise in "how much better could I make reddit if I had its user base?" You don't have the users though, so you're doing the wrong thing.
You want people to comment on each other's posts, right? Then you should basically show every post to every user... the bitter reality is that you need users to engage with content they didn't plan to engage with. That doesn't mean outrage farming, it can/should mean being a high quality source of info, questions, culture - all on one page.
Hackernews understands this, or - if it doesn't - it at least plays by the rule of "have ONE good frontpage." That's also how reddit started.
7 comments
[ 0.24 ms ] story [ 15.6 ms ] threadI don't think it would make enough ad revenue to be worth fending off scrapers, though.
https://www.reddit.com/r/RedditAlternatives/comments/1umrhpz...
Still, I do think Reddit definitely needs more alternatives because their moderation system is broken with power-tripping moderators, and the community admins don't want to do anything about it.
All the best!
- for starters literally all of them across every subreddit need to be fired
- all the banned people need to be unbanned
- a new system of voting moderators into existence needs to be brought about
- how exactly would such a system work? when you create a subreddit, you are no longer its default moderator for ever
- you have a grace period like a month or a year or something and then all the members of that subreddit get to poll who should be the moderator
- mind you i am writing this literally as a mod on reddit with a sub with more than 60K weekly visitors
- this is rotational in nature and every year repolls happen so no more powertripping
All of these features result in atomization of an already tiny content pool. This is the opposite of what you need to jumpstart a reddit clone. This is a mental exercise in "how much better could I make reddit if I had its user base?" You don't have the users though, so you're doing the wrong thing.
You want people to comment on each other's posts, right? Then you should basically show every post to every user... the bitter reality is that you need users to engage with content they didn't plan to engage with. That doesn't mean outrage farming, it can/should mean being a high quality source of info, questions, culture - all on one page.
Hackernews understands this, or - if it doesn't - it at least plays by the rule of "have ONE good frontpage." That's also how reddit started.