8 comments

[ 0.22 ms ] story [ 35.3 ms ] thread
Shouldn't this be a private dataset?
Does this include the several stupid "thin wrapper on ChatGPT to 'help' people with depression/ADHD/etc." startups that I recall from about two seconds after ChatGPT came out?

Basically: "I want to be a founder, I have no expertise and a superficial understanding of the domain but I've got some tech, so here's a non-solution I'm selling as 'the best thing ever for you.'"

Starting at page 20, the report looks like someone let AI create a HTML page and then just converted it to PDF. There are misplaced "Calendar", "Money Bag" and "Globe" emojis floating above the title of each startup analysis.

I suspect that nobody, including the authors, ever read this 391 page report.

The problem with mental health monetization is: it doesn't pay to make people feel better.

The problem with most of capitalism, is the same. There's just more money to be made from people with problems than solving problems.

Post-mortem's are very useful, though often not welcome.

I appreciate the top-line summary and the approach looks promising, but I don't have time to sort through the data or details.

Both are likely common, so don't be disheartened by complaints :)

(comment deleted)