HN Explorer

21 comments

[ 3.2 ms ] story [ 16.0 ms ] thread
mic_sm
Interesting.

But how it differs from OpenClaw? Or are they can be connected together?

lukeguo1221
I guess they’re different layers. OpenClaw is the agent, Loadout is the tool-connection layer you drop into it. And they connect: OpenClaw is a listed supported agent, so you can equip your Claw with Loadout’s 1,000+ integrations.
luciana1u
that's exactly the read. the agent stays your agent, loadout just hands it the integration plumbing it'd otherwise be missing.
luciana1u
they're two layers, not competitors — OpenClaw is the agent, Loadout is the integration layer you drop into it. and they do connect: OpenClaw's on the supported agents list.
ljhskyso
How different is it compared to Composio?
luciana1u
Composio is a platform you build on; Loadout is the layer your existing agent drops into via one skill. Same 1000+ integrations, but you keep using Codex or Claude Code as your agent and we handle the accounts, OAuth, and audit trail.
yulei_s
interesting idea..what are the benefits compared to connector inside codex?
luciana1u
the connector is codex-only and single-service; loadout works across codex, claude code, and openclaw against 1000+ tools, and it's a skill so it drops into whatever host you already run.
lukeguo1221
This looks really cool, nice work! How do you handle OAuth and credential storage across all those integrations, is it self-hosted or do the tokens live on your side?
luciana1u
your own accounts stay connected through your side, we just broker the calls. for tools you don't have a subscription to, we can use a shared key on our end so you don't need to sign up for each one.