18 comments

[ 0.23 ms ] story [ 50.6 ms ] thread
So they made the battery, arguably the most concerning thing to replace as the vehicle ages, ridiculous to replace?

At least they're not reusing names for entirely new things. Mustang Mach-e is so weird. New vehicle, new name. Good

Shoulda gone with Canyonero as the name.

Love my ranger. ~700km on a tank of gasoline. Easy to work on at home. The factory installed upfitter switches make adding 12v additions easy.

If it's about the size of a Maverick as the article suggests, that's not small at all.
Shouldn't a Fathom have a six foot bed, by definition?
maybe they deep-sixed that definition in the marketing documents.
For what it’s worth, I absolutely love my f-150 lightning. I just wish we had 1 MW charging like the Chinese do.
I’d be happy to get the advertised charge speeds on my Equinox. The number of times I use a charging station that delivers ~120kW at most is maddening.

And it’s this kind of thing that stops mass adoption. When you fuel an ICE car, the pump just delivers fuel and that’s that. The price of fuel is prominently advertised and the experience is the same no matter the station.

Charging on the other hand is an exercise in frustration. Charging stations have different advertised power delivery rates; often they can’t meet those rates (is it the charging station? Is it your car? No way to know!); pricing is opaque; charging can stop seemingly at random .. and then you get levied the penalty congestion rate for using a charging station.

My parents asked me if they should get an EV. I advised a conventional hybrid. They are too old to have the patience to deal with all this.

Imagine buying a new EV that can't drive itself. What a waste of money
Disagree, I rather not subsidize that. I also don't really get why it has to be an EV, can't a self driving car just as easily be gas powered?
Self-driving usually intersects with EV's simply for the fact that EV's are a newer idea, and self-driving can't (sadly) be really well currently added to existing cars. Comma.ai isn't really on the track to compete.

Those that are in market for an ICE car have an order of magnitude larger used car market available for them. You can get a car from the year 2000 and drive it no problem.

If you are looking at a car that's the best worth for your money, while "subsidizing" better future tech that will directly save lives, if the latter is an added negative for you, well that's just misanthropy.

> the architecture uses large aluminum unicastings to incorporate more than 100 parts that would otherwise be separate

They may have learned a few tricks from those teardowns of BYDs.

I honestly think unicastings are a horrible idea. BYD for most of its flagship vehicles do not use unicasting. I think unicasting should be reserved for the cheapest of vehicles in which an accident means the vehicle is recycled rather than unsafely repaired.
> Rather than a distinct floor component, the Fathom’s interior parts mount directly to the top of the structural battery.

I'm looking forward to the IIHS test results.

Most EV's use a structural battery like this either for frames or direct attachments. Go have a look at some EURO NCAP testing of Chinese EV's
An electric ute? I'm interested. Seems like a good move!
Ford once again getting the messaging wrong and shipping what is essentially a glorified sedan with a useless external 4 foot bed.

Why do we have to keep making family-haulers for whipped dads that aren't allowed to have a two-seater? Why do we HAVE to force the entire family to go with us wherever we go? The wife already gets the lifted Expedition XLT to nearly run over little Jimmy with at the crosswalk (or as I lovingly call it, the 'F Series' - Canyonero strikes again).

Give us back a two seat basic pickup like the Ranger used to be, cowards.

I'd pick a $5k cheaper, analog Slate instead for not having to deal with Ford's post-sales ads, subscriptions, and DRM.