HN Explorer

8 comments

[ 1.3 ms ] story [ 13.4 ms ] thread
oliculipolicula
That was fun but this is gun?

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-026-03375-4

The two teams could "synergize" their tacit knowledge, overcome "involution"?

Without open peer review like in the old days it's hard, even with frontier models, for nonexperts to know if the above breakthrough was (unfairly?) relegated or how significant TFA is truly

dgellow
In that case you can ignore the article, if it is really significant for layman you will see more articles in the coming weeks/months with simpler explanations
BigTTYGothGF
> open peer review like in the old days it's hard

I'm not sure the old days ever had that.

iandanforth
The writing here seems very odd. It reads like a product announcement or blog page, not an article in Nature. I'm left questioning its validity.
gavinray 

  > "a single layer of Bi2Sr2CuO6+δ (Bi-2201)"
I did not realize one could learn how much chemistry they did not know from a single name. "+δ" is one I've never seen before.