2 comments of 3

[ 0.31 ms ] story [ 17.7 ms ] thread
Why is this a problem?

If the courts are using ai we should know why and how.

There should be a human reviewing it.

The judge should be making their own decision that shouldn't be based on automated tools.

So, he's representing himself, has already pissed off the judge, and is going up against a healthcare-oriented law firm. Does his case stand a snowball's chance in hell?