Similarly, I've created a simple Pi extension [1] that allows you to summon your LLMs inline from your notes (obsidian or any text format) and it's able to apply any edits (via Pi edit tools)
At this point, are we sharing these AI-written articles to make fun of how bad they are? Is there any substance left to discuss?
> When the panel proposes a change to the file, the Änderungen prüfen modal opens first.
This is in the first section. If they never bothered to proofread their article, how is it worth the time it takes to read it?
I’m not being facetious. It’s becoming extremely hard to separate the wheat from the chaff. Every piece of software looks and reads like a homogenous pile of Claudisms. Even if the software in question is good, I immediately lose trust in the developer’s good faith when I see stuff like this.
5 comments of 10
[ 0.27 ms ] story [ 18.6 ms ] thread[1] https://github.com/piqoni/pi-piqo
> When the panel proposes a change to the file, the Änderungen prüfen modal opens first.
This is in the first section. If they never bothered to proofread their article, how is it worth the time it takes to read it?
I’m not being facetious. It’s becoming extremely hard to separate the wheat from the chaff. Every piece of software looks and reads like a homogenous pile of Claudisms. Even if the software in question is good, I immediately lose trust in the developer’s good faith when I see stuff like this.