Well, if a study decides to use a made up partisan propaganda term like "undocumented immigrant", which is a phrase which holds zero legal weight, has historically never existed until recent years, and which was created by and forced into the lexicon by political activists, it instantly invalidates the study in my mind. The people manipulating language to better serve their goals usually aren't the good guys. I instantly just assume the opposite of whatever the study is trying to say is likely true and move on.
Japan and Nepal prohibited immigration for centuries. France used to prohibit entry without a permit. The Sentinel islanders prohibit immigration in the present day. Was it illegal for them to do so?
4 comments
[ 0.26 ms ] story [ 9.0 ms ] thread