[–] grim_io 24d ago ↗ I swear, Thanos-snapping half of any LLM readme will always be an improvement. [–] arsalanshahid 24d ago ↗ The microsite might help, mate: https://chap.brightbeam.works
[–] m4ck_ 24d ago ↗ CHAP's already taken though. [–] Avicebron 24d ago ↗ Idk man, I had this idea for a Person-to-Prompt Protocol and I think this would help a lot.. [–] aib 24d ago ↗ Did you steal my idea of Human-to-Trasformer Protocol?? [–] ronsor 24d ago ↗ You'll need the Person-to-Prompt Training Protocol to go with it. [–] arsalanshahid 24d ago ↗ Yup, that may be the sequel CHAP would at least capture the human corrections needed to train it. [–] [dead] arsalanshahid 24d ago ↗ [dead] [–] arsalanshahid 24d ago ↗ True, CHAP has been used elsewhere as an acronym ... hard to find a term truly unique these days that also communicates the the conceptAnyway, ours focuses specifically on making joint human-agent work traceable and auditable.
[–] Avicebron 24d ago ↗ Idk man, I had this idea for a Person-to-Prompt Protocol and I think this would help a lot.. [–] aib 24d ago ↗ Did you steal my idea of Human-to-Trasformer Protocol?? [–] ronsor 24d ago ↗ You'll need the Person-to-Prompt Training Protocol to go with it. [–] arsalanshahid 24d ago ↗ Yup, that may be the sequel CHAP would at least capture the human corrections needed to train it. [–] [dead] arsalanshahid 24d ago ↗ [dead]
[–] ronsor 24d ago ↗ You'll need the Person-to-Prompt Training Protocol to go with it. [–] arsalanshahid 24d ago ↗ Yup, that may be the sequel CHAP would at least capture the human corrections needed to train it.
[–] arsalanshahid 24d ago ↗ Yup, that may be the sequel CHAP would at least capture the human corrections needed to train it.
[–] arsalanshahid 24d ago ↗ True, CHAP has been used elsewhere as an acronym ... hard to find a term truly unique these days that also communicates the the conceptAnyway, ours focuses specifically on making joint human-agent work traceable and auditable.
[–] seahorseemoji 24d ago ↗ People in the comments are rough! I think this looks cool, nice job! [–] arsalanshahid 24d ago ↗ Thank you, I appreciate that!
[–] OutOfHere 24d ago ↗ I am happy saving my refined ticket prompts in a spec folder. I don't know why I need this. The only thing I need is to combine the non-first prompts into the first prompt, since the first prompt is the primary spec for the project. [–] [dead] arsalanshahid 24d ago ↗ [dead]
16 comments
[ 0.23 ms ] story [ 5.1 ms ] threadAnyway, ours focuses specifically on making joint human-agent work traceable and auditable.