Show HN: Make your logo extra bright on HDR screens (soverybright.com)
Certain logos started standing out to me on LinkedIn as brighter/whiter than everything else around them.
I dug in and found out this is accomplished by adding a gain-map to an existing JPEG, visible only on HDR screens like a newer MacBook Pro. LinkedIn is the only social network I've found that isn't stripping them out, but of course you serve them up on your own site.
I worked with Claude Code to turn it into a little browser-based utility (no registration) and hope you find it useful!
78 comments
[ 17.9 ms ] story [ 1048 ms ] threadThis way we get to skip awareness, interest and desire and get the prospect straight to action.
You know it will be annoying.
https://en.everybodywiki.com/Plonk_(Usenet)
But I agree that app developers shouldn’t do this, or should at least provide an option to turn it off. (Some apps allow customizing the app icon color, so it seems that should be possible.)
If you are not outside in bright sunlight it’s almost certain that your screen is not at its highest brightness in the first place.
All HDR is doing is adding more range between the darkest element and the brightest element.
Basically if you go to this webpage and maximize your screen brightness the HDR effect goes away because you’re already telling your screen to maximize brightness everywhere. Put the screen brightness at 50% and the HDR effect is visible.
Still, even with the best intent what you suggest is still annoying. Okay, you got my attention, i now know what you wanted me to know. Are you going to nag me for all eternity?
GovTech is still full of them. But B2B/B2C, you're right.
The nagging will continue until morale improves.
chrome://flags/#force-color-profile -> sRGB
> Clearly we need more of it
I do not in fact want sites trying to get around my display preferences to post their visual presence on screen.
Settings > Accessibility > Display Text & Size > Reduce White Point
Do you not have any choice of what websites you go to? Is someone picking up your phone and putting it in your face and making you use it?
I personally don’t consider this anywhere near as problematic as auto-play audio, but I recognize that that’s subjective.
(1) HDR display (e.g. you bought a macbook/iphone) doesn’t mean you want random videos in the instagram feed to be full brightness despite setting your screen brightness to minimum in a dark room and (2) reducing white point just darkens stuff across the display, it doesn’t disable the thing people are complaining about.
So to me the user has a clear off switch and the content creator also gets to express their creative freedom to use the feature or not.
If you don’t want to see HDR content you can do something else with your day. Nobody is holding us hostage to use our phones in a dark room or scroll Instagram.
This would be like buying a color TV and getting upset that the commercials don’t remain in black and white, and saying you didn’t consent to that.
But unlike in the color TV analogy we have two methods of disabling (low power mode and reduce white point setting) and we don’t just have 3 TV channels to choose from.
To become more metaphorical again, compare it to suddenly playing a loud, screeching sound or displaying porn or gore. The technology allows you to do it, but it’s offensive and you deserve the resulting anger.
That there is no viable setting to turn it off means there is no basis for consent.
A better analogy is honestly more like “I don’t like the HN website because the top part is orange and I don’t like that color.”
“Sudden and unexpected” isn’t really how I would describe affirmatively choosing websites to visit. Sure, I guess it’s possible to click on a link with something unexpected, but it’s not like a TV channel where content is being sent to you in real time with no control over what is happening. If you are aware that a website uses HDR and you don’t like it you can stop using it.
This idea of a lack of consent is not really possible to be applicable because you can leave the website and do something else.
This is exactly why the FCC regulates antenna transmissions to disallow things like porn and gore on terrestrial television. Those radio transmissions are something we aren’t consenting to and they literally enter our homes. But if HBO shows you some skin and some blood you can’t complain about that because nobody forced you to view that content.
The analogy here would be “non-consensually hearing heavy metal music” because you decided to go to a heavy metal concert. Nobody twisted your arm and forced you to go there.
I provided two different viable settings to turn it off, low power mode and reduce white point, so this idea that there’s no basis for consent is bunk.
https://www.bustelo.com.ar/apps/superbright/index.en.php
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vantablack
A uBlock Origin rule for the whole domain of anybody who does this would be fine too.
Immediate irritation and if I could setup an adblock rule to stop it somehow, I would.
The worst cases give me the starting pangs of a headache, and make me adjust my display to account for it.
Can we somehow make it a rule that a website has to ask if they can blind me first?
like something on the line of "if (image small || partially covered || mostly transparent) then don't use HDR"
soverybright.com##:style(dynamic-range-limit: standard !important)
linkedin.com##:style(dynamic-range-limit: standard !important)
fwiw it seems like “reduce white point” overrides any of these effects - which is good.
…and it’s slop.