Security researchers find surveillance implants in Chinese-made routers sold wor (tomshardware.com) 2 points by newsomix9xl 15d ago ↗ HN
[–] newsomix9xl 15d ago ↗ Security researchers find surveillance implants in Chinese-made routers sold worldwide — three different backdoor-like implants hidden in firmware [–] bigyabai 15d ago ↗ > sold worldwide — three different backdoorPlease don't use LLMs to copywrite a response to the article. [–] NekkoDroid 14d ago ↗ Is this some joke I am missing? Cuz their comment is just the entire title of the article since it was cut off in the post.
[–] bigyabai 15d ago ↗ > sold worldwide — three different backdoorPlease don't use LLMs to copywrite a response to the article. [–] NekkoDroid 14d ago ↗ Is this some joke I am missing? Cuz their comment is just the entire title of the article since it was cut off in the post.
[–] NekkoDroid 14d ago ↗ Is this some joke I am missing? Cuz their comment is just the entire title of the article since it was cut off in the post.
[–] ThrowawayTestr 15d ago ↗ Water found in ocean [–] newsomix9xl 15d ago ↗ You mean "no surprise" or you mean "surveillance tool found in ocean of surveillance" or both?
[–] newsomix9xl 15d ago ↗ You mean "no surprise" or you mean "surveillance tool found in ocean of surveillance" or both?
[–] JohnnyLarue 15d ago ↗ If there's no oversight of tech companies, this is just what they do - they think they're adding features that will help them compete, but since they don't have a security focus, they rely on obscurity. [–] newsomix9xl 15d ago ↗ I think Chinese companies are all joint state owned enterprises or similar. [–] cyanydeez 15d ago ↗ Dont blame on malice which is equally explained by capitalism.Flock didnt just start a surveillance system in the US by themselves. [–] newsomix9xl 15d ago ↗ So, the poster said unsupervised companies will surveil to gain an advantage.I suggested Chinese companies aren't unsupervised, but are in fact state owned and very supervised (Chinese state surveillance is well known).You point out that surveillance is also a profit making business/product (flock).You could point to google, meta, and AI as emerging or profitable surveillance tool products.Does that mean Chinese products are engaged in free market surveillance and not state directed? [–] cyanydeez 15d ago ↗ So China is so supervised and controled that it took then 10 years to find the richest man guilty and sented to prison: https://www.reuters.com/world/china/china-evergrande-founder...This is the logic of paranoia; we know they have a surveillance state the same way you know America has one.
[–] newsomix9xl 15d ago ↗ I think Chinese companies are all joint state owned enterprises or similar. [–] cyanydeez 15d ago ↗ Dont blame on malice which is equally explained by capitalism.Flock didnt just start a surveillance system in the US by themselves. [–] newsomix9xl 15d ago ↗ So, the poster said unsupervised companies will surveil to gain an advantage.I suggested Chinese companies aren't unsupervised, but are in fact state owned and very supervised (Chinese state surveillance is well known).You point out that surveillance is also a profit making business/product (flock).You could point to google, meta, and AI as emerging or profitable surveillance tool products.Does that mean Chinese products are engaged in free market surveillance and not state directed? [–] cyanydeez 15d ago ↗ So China is so supervised and controled that it took then 10 years to find the richest man guilty and sented to prison: https://www.reuters.com/world/china/china-evergrande-founder...This is the logic of paranoia; we know they have a surveillance state the same way you know America has one.
[–] cyanydeez 15d ago ↗ Dont blame on malice which is equally explained by capitalism.Flock didnt just start a surveillance system in the US by themselves. [–] newsomix9xl 15d ago ↗ So, the poster said unsupervised companies will surveil to gain an advantage.I suggested Chinese companies aren't unsupervised, but are in fact state owned and very supervised (Chinese state surveillance is well known).You point out that surveillance is also a profit making business/product (flock).You could point to google, meta, and AI as emerging or profitable surveillance tool products.Does that mean Chinese products are engaged in free market surveillance and not state directed? [–] cyanydeez 15d ago ↗ So China is so supervised and controled that it took then 10 years to find the richest man guilty and sented to prison: https://www.reuters.com/world/china/china-evergrande-founder...This is the logic of paranoia; we know they have a surveillance state the same way you know America has one.
[–] newsomix9xl 15d ago ↗ So, the poster said unsupervised companies will surveil to gain an advantage.I suggested Chinese companies aren't unsupervised, but are in fact state owned and very supervised (Chinese state surveillance is well known).You point out that surveillance is also a profit making business/product (flock).You could point to google, meta, and AI as emerging or profitable surveillance tool products.Does that mean Chinese products are engaged in free market surveillance and not state directed? [–] cyanydeez 15d ago ↗ So China is so supervised and controled that it took then 10 years to find the richest man guilty and sented to prison: https://www.reuters.com/world/china/china-evergrande-founder...This is the logic of paranoia; we know they have a surveillance state the same way you know America has one.
[–] cyanydeez 15d ago ↗ So China is so supervised and controled that it took then 10 years to find the richest man guilty and sented to prison: https://www.reuters.com/world/china/china-evergrande-founder...This is the logic of paranoia; we know they have a surveillance state the same way you know America has one.
10 comments
[ 0.21 ms ] story [ 8.8 ms ] threadPlease don't use LLMs to copywrite a response to the article.
Flock didnt just start a surveillance system in the US by themselves.
I suggested Chinese companies aren't unsupervised, but are in fact state owned and very supervised (Chinese state surveillance is well known).
You point out that surveillance is also a profit making business/product (flock).
You could point to google, meta, and AI as emerging or profitable surveillance tool products.
Does that mean Chinese products are engaged in free market surveillance and not state directed?
This is the logic of paranoia; we know they have a surveillance state the same way you know America has one.