7 comments

[ 0.20 ms ] story [ 22.7 ms ] thread
A very incoherent article. Reads like a Submarine[1].

[1]: https://www.paulgraham.com/submarine.html

That article is brilliant, can't believe I have never seen it before.

The media (especially in today's environment) works to sell ad views, not make the reader more informed.

Way (way) too many people think that because the media confirms their beliefs, the media is honest.

“News is what someone doesn’t want you to know. The rest is just advertising.” Variously attributed to George Orwell and William Randolph Hearst.
I don't think any company will be able to hold a significant monopoly in the space for the simple law of economics: high margins (especially combined with high absolute volumes) attract competition.

And the wider the margins and volumes the more competitors have incentives in making gigantic investments.

Given proper oversight yes.

Otherwise companies can absolutely get a monopoly and cement it. Buy up competition, pressure adversaries, hog resources and so on.

Nvidia doesn't have to remain a monopoly to get all the profit.

In the smartphone market, Apple isn't #1 in units but generates 75% of the profit of the whole market.

Would you rather be #1 in units or profit?

There is a reason why Apple can ask for prices only few competitors can keep up with and the reason isn't the HW for sure. Similarly with Nvidia, the margins come from the ecosystem, not the HW.