Cardiac imaging study found plaque in 34.6% of men in their 30s (empirical.health)

One thing that struck me about this particular study is that they used two different imaging techniques (CCTA and ultrasound) to measure soft plaque. (This is necessary to capture both coronary and peripheral arteries.)

What exactly is this article? I've read it twice and I've no idea. There's plaque in 34.6% of men, is that bad? Does that matter? I've still no idea. Does this article had have a whole section I'm missing because I'm not logged in? Are the typos a sign that it's not AI slop or a signal that it's *super* AI slop?

Disclaimer:

This post is from a business that performs blood testing $$$.

Men are cooked. We are not doing well on average.