They should really put the video/gif from their repo README on the website somewhere. I clicked around for a while trying to see what it looked like and finally found it on Github.
As someone else noted, the site isn't affiliated with the project it's promoting. So there are two distinct "they"s in play here. No idea why that's the case, but it feels sus.
Haven't seen this in a while and had a look at the lazygit repository on GitHub and the README is just quite literally unreadable since I last looked at it.
The README is now full of ads, lots of nonsense on the page just to reach the text and on top of that, it is now written by Claude.
So right now Lazygit has become by definition slop. [0]
This is something I’ve seen before. Someone is registering domain names related to open source projects and then ‘creating’ slop websites about the projects. Not sure what the play is, or whether this falls into that category, but it’s really weird and takes control away from open source maintainers in a scary way. Maybe it’s extortion or maybe it’s an malware thing. I highly doubt it’s out of the goodness of someone’s heart.
Open source maintainers shouldn’t have to register their projects as trademarks/proactively register domains to avoid this, but that seems like the only strategy?
It honestly makes working with git so easy and fast that I would say it's the ideal way to interact with git. I highly recommend checking it out for a month if you're someone who would use git commands in the shell. I don't know how fast and visually clear the gui interfaces like the ones built into VS Code or Sublime Merge are but as someone who uses a terminal test editor having a tool like this has been fantastic.
Something else to try if you're a fan of alternative git interfaces is Jujutsu. It's CLI, and it's more of its own interface, but it's very Git-compatible, other than submodules. You pull from and push to Git remotes.
I actually use Jujutsu and jjui now but used lazygit for years. Jjui still isn't as polished as lazygit (I've added quite a few lazygit keymaps like opening the bookmark as a PR, untracking or restoring files in the current change) but it's close.
That said, I think lazygit is much faster than plain jj CLI commands. I just use JJ for undo and merge conflict resolution for the most part. (2026 was my year of JJ and I am loving it, but I can't say I don't miss lazygit's speed and niceties like showing ci/cd build statuses on each branch/bookmark)
So this is a landing page made by someone who doesn’t maintain the actual tool? This strikes me as a potential scam—build some domain rep off someone else’s tool then capitalize somehow
15 comments
[ 19.0 ms ] story [ 60.7 ms ] thread"© 2026 lazygit.dev — Unofficial site. Not affiliated with the official lazygit project or Jesse Duffield. "
The official site is the GitHub repository [0]
[0] https://github.com/jesseduffield/lazygit
https://terminaltrove.com/lazygit/
And yes, a proper homepage should have this, too. It’s just that the link in the OP isn’t the proper homepage for LazyGit.
The README is now full of ads, lots of nonsense on the page just to reach the text and on top of that, it is now written by Claude.
So right now Lazygit has become by definition slop. [0]
[0] https://codeberg.org/ethical-foss/open-slopware
strange
Open source maintainers shouldn’t have to register their projects as trademarks/proactively register domains to avoid this, but that seems like the only strategy?
That said, I think lazygit is much faster than plain jj CLI commands. I just use JJ for undo and merge conflict resolution for the most part. (2026 was my year of JJ and I am loving it, but I can't say I don't miss lazygit's speed and niceties like showing ci/cd build statuses on each branch/bookmark)