Omarchy Funding Climbs to $13M, with over $4M a Year Set for Spending (linuxiac.com) 1 points by dxs 6d ago ↗ HN
[–] downrightmike 6d ago ↗ This is clearly money laundering [–] colesantiago 6d ago ↗ > This is [clearly] money launderingThis is a serious allegation.Do you have a clear definitive reputable source for this claim of Omarchy engaging in money laundering? [–] copperx 6d ago ↗ Getting an investment of 13M for some config files is scandalous. Especially when the creator is rich himself.Mark Shuttleworth funded Ubuntu completely out of pocket. [–] colesantiago 6d ago ↗ But this isn't answering the question of Omarchy / The Omacom Foundation engaging in money laundering.Where is the definitive source for this? [–] copperx 6d ago ↗ You took it as an allegation, I took it as an hypothesis.If someone got paid 14 million as a dog walker, wouldn't you suspect something nefarious? Sure, it could be totally legit but ... [–] colesantiago 3d ago ↗ This is absolutely not what a hypothesis is at all.I ask again.Where is your definitive source of the Omacom Foundation money laundering? [–] TiredOfLife 5d ago ↗ > for some config files is scandalousYou should really update your copypasta [–] slig 5d ago ↗ Billionaires laundering up 0.1% of their net worth, makes total sense. [–] colesantiago 3d ago ↗ An actual source makes sense for this. [–] monooso 5d ago ↗ And you clearly have no idea what money laundering is.> Money laundering is a criminal offence by which the proceeds of criminal activities, such as fraud or bribery, are converted into assets that appear to have a legitimate origin.Source: https://www.lawsociety.org.uk/topics/anti-money-laundering/m...
[–] colesantiago 6d ago ↗ > This is [clearly] money launderingThis is a serious allegation.Do you have a clear definitive reputable source for this claim of Omarchy engaging in money laundering? [–] copperx 6d ago ↗ Getting an investment of 13M for some config files is scandalous. Especially when the creator is rich himself.Mark Shuttleworth funded Ubuntu completely out of pocket. [–] colesantiago 6d ago ↗ But this isn't answering the question of Omarchy / The Omacom Foundation engaging in money laundering.Where is the definitive source for this? [–] copperx 6d ago ↗ You took it as an allegation, I took it as an hypothesis.If someone got paid 14 million as a dog walker, wouldn't you suspect something nefarious? Sure, it could be totally legit but ... [–] colesantiago 3d ago ↗ This is absolutely not what a hypothesis is at all.I ask again.Where is your definitive source of the Omacom Foundation money laundering? [–] TiredOfLife 5d ago ↗ > for some config files is scandalousYou should really update your copypasta [–] slig 5d ago ↗ Billionaires laundering up 0.1% of their net worth, makes total sense. [–] colesantiago 3d ago ↗ An actual source makes sense for this.
[–] copperx 6d ago ↗ Getting an investment of 13M for some config files is scandalous. Especially when the creator is rich himself.Mark Shuttleworth funded Ubuntu completely out of pocket. [–] colesantiago 6d ago ↗ But this isn't answering the question of Omarchy / The Omacom Foundation engaging in money laundering.Where is the definitive source for this? [–] copperx 6d ago ↗ You took it as an allegation, I took it as an hypothesis.If someone got paid 14 million as a dog walker, wouldn't you suspect something nefarious? Sure, it could be totally legit but ... [–] colesantiago 3d ago ↗ This is absolutely not what a hypothesis is at all.I ask again.Where is your definitive source of the Omacom Foundation money laundering? [–] TiredOfLife 5d ago ↗ > for some config files is scandalousYou should really update your copypasta
[–] colesantiago 6d ago ↗ But this isn't answering the question of Omarchy / The Omacom Foundation engaging in money laundering.Where is the definitive source for this? [–] copperx 6d ago ↗ You took it as an allegation, I took it as an hypothesis.If someone got paid 14 million as a dog walker, wouldn't you suspect something nefarious? Sure, it could be totally legit but ... [–] colesantiago 3d ago ↗ This is absolutely not what a hypothesis is at all.I ask again.Where is your definitive source of the Omacom Foundation money laundering?
[–] copperx 6d ago ↗ You took it as an allegation, I took it as an hypothesis.If someone got paid 14 million as a dog walker, wouldn't you suspect something nefarious? Sure, it could be totally legit but ... [–] colesantiago 3d ago ↗ This is absolutely not what a hypothesis is at all.I ask again.Where is your definitive source of the Omacom Foundation money laundering?
[–] colesantiago 3d ago ↗ This is absolutely not what a hypothesis is at all.I ask again.Where is your definitive source of the Omacom Foundation money laundering?
[–] TiredOfLife 5d ago ↗ > for some config files is scandalousYou should really update your copypasta
[–] slig 5d ago ↗ Billionaires laundering up 0.1% of their net worth, makes total sense. [–] colesantiago 3d ago ↗ An actual source makes sense for this.
[–] monooso 5d ago ↗ And you clearly have no idea what money laundering is.> Money laundering is a criminal offence by which the proceeds of criminal activities, such as fraud or bribery, are converted into assets that appear to have a legitimate origin.Source: https://www.lawsociety.org.uk/topics/anti-money-laundering/m...
10 comments
[ 0.25 ms ] story [ 15.9 ms ] threadThis is a serious allegation.
Do you have a clear definitive reputable source for this claim of Omarchy engaging in money laundering?
Mark Shuttleworth funded Ubuntu completely out of pocket.
Where is the definitive source for this?
If someone got paid 14 million as a dog walker, wouldn't you suspect something nefarious? Sure, it could be totally legit but ...
I ask again.
Where is your definitive source of the Omacom Foundation money laundering?
You should really update your copypasta
> Money laundering is a criminal offence by which the proceeds of criminal activities, such as fraud or bribery, are converted into assets that appear to have a legitimate origin.
Source: https://www.lawsociety.org.uk/topics/anti-money-laundering/m...