4 comments

[ 0.22 ms ] story [ 259 ms ] thread
Just because LLMs can write copy for webpages doesn't mean they should. A landing page should not warrant a tl;dr.
Some people don't want to read anything these days, suspecting an LLM. Not code. Not ideas. Nothing. They're weary of LLM-generated writing.

I couldn't get it any simpler. It has big letters on the top. It has tiny code snippets illustrating what the language is like. Oh well. I tried.

Your copy and design is very obviously LLM-generated, which unfortunately distracts from any technical merits. That's the double-edged sword of marketing, and why simple high-signal copy and examples are often better for technical writing.

For example, you most definitely don't need 6 cards for each header point: it's actively tiring to read.

I'm as tired as you when the top comment always seems to be crying "this was AI generated". Especially since the use of AI to make a new language is almost inevitable, as it is too onerous to experiment, build and innovative without.

But minimaxir put out some very thoughtful comments you'd be wise to lend your ears to, because the technical merits your work seems to have will get drowned out.