31 comments

[ 1.2 ms ] story [ 10.2 ms ] thread
ironic that an article presumably about avoiding use of cloudflare is apparently unable to handle spikes in traffic caused by posting it on a forum
He's is running GitLab, a rather inefficient webserver.
it would probably be up, if it was using cloudflare...
Looks like their site is down, but from their github bio:

" Ⓐnti-capitalist Free Software developer, trans rights are human rights, Black Lives Matter, abolish all prisons, 0xACAB "

I would love if there was some content here besides vague posting about Cloudflare bad. Like why? There truly is no thesis to convince me right now.

Also love the irony of getting an HN hug of death w/o Cloudflare

I can't shake the feeling that since its dealing with a huge amount of network traffic and it also strips SSL from every connection before passing it onto origins, they are a very juicy target for a certain three letter agency to place a tap.

The bit I'm less bothered about is the centralising effect it has on the internet.

> decloudflare

> visit website

> mission accomplished

I wish life was that simple

The irony of this shit ass site loading at a glacial pace lol
Is there a good alt to cloudflare? I don’t want to feed the beast but they are substantially better / cheaper for my use case (domain registrations and tiny websites)
Same, I’d rather not use them but there’s really not much else out there that can offer what Cloudflare does for the price (free). In particular I love the free egress from backblaze.

I’d gladly jump ship if there was a competent competitor, even if paid… within reason.

AWS Cloudfront + S3 is basically free for tiny sites. I have a Terraform module to spin everything up easily.
Incredibly disappointing just how many comments are making fun of the site for not handling the traffic, and saying that "they should have just used Cloudflare". Would Cloudflare caching the site have helped? Maybe/probably, but the user's point (visible on the github mirror https://github.com/jiakaiBot/deCloudflare/blob/89983e1501dbb...) has nothing to do with availability and everything to do with Cloudflare's position as a gatekeeper on the internet.

People who have been around for awhile should probably remember the days when every DDoS site on the internet was hosted behind Cloudflare and CF was notoriously slow about responding to abuse complaints or helping them get to the actual hosts on the other side. Or when Matthew went on a whole thing about how he had a moral obligation to provide services to literal nazis.

from en.action.md:

> Redirect or block "Cloudflare Warp" users from accessing your website. And provide a reason if you can.

come on, really? what does this achieve? only thing i can think of is trying to get the user off of WARP, but i can pretty confidently say that before doing that i'll just not use the website. or if i really care about the content i'll turn it off until i'm done and back on it goes

I mean I think it speaks loudly that a lot of sites, blogs particularly, wouldn't feel so required to use a service like cloudflare if their viewer visible contents were just statically generated rather than requiring notable amounts of resources to compute each visit.
You've made a great point.

Just not the point you were trying to make.

I closed the tab after 1 minute of failing to load a readme.md.

What!? Cloudflare is fucking awesome and completely optional.
Your site isn't even loading; it looks like you should use Cloudflare.
Cloudflare is simply following the time-honored trajectory:

1. Good company starts, with good service and mission

2. Because company has good service and mission, company grows to control a majority of the market

3. Company realizes they can leverage their market for other means and sells their soul to the devil

4. People realize company is no longer good

5a. People leave company

-or-

5b. Company is now a monopoly and people can't leave

Sources: - Microsoft - Google - Others

Everybody wants alternatives to Cloudflare but nobody wants to build alternatives to Cloudflare.
Cloudflare defeats HTTPS which is a sufficient reason to not use it. Enough said.
Looks like you’ve convinced everyone, good work.