“Senators stripped the bill of two key provisions”
Which senators ?
I asked deepseek
“ Short answer: if you need a name for who sponsored the amendment that stripped the DUNS identifier and extended the timeline to five years, it's Sen. Bill Cassidy (R‑La.), via the committee substitute. Sen. Jon Husted (R‑Ohio) sponsored the other filed amendment, which addressed address disclosure rather than the identifier, and which did not make it into the reported bill.”
Correctness isn't the issue, it's that you copy pasted an LLM response in a form for humans. You could have extracted the names you were looking for and posted those, but instead you disrespected future readers by copy pasting slop.
I think you’re wrong ….. I gave output for a conclusion that I checked from a tool that I had used in order to clearly show I had used it. I also checked these conclusions on my own.
This doesn’t actually meet any definition of AI slop? Other than I put the word “deepseek” in there.
You not understanding how a tool works or what AI slop is and just instantly getting triggered is the bigger issue.
You’re over applying the term and probably need to go outside for a walk.
5 comments
[ 32.8 ms ] story [ 379 ms ] threadWhich senators ?
I asked deepseek
“ Short answer: if you need a name for who sponsored the amendment that stripped the DUNS identifier and extended the timeline to five years, it's Sen. Bill Cassidy (R‑La.), via the committee substitute. Sen. Jon Husted (R‑Ohio) sponsored the other filed amendment, which addressed address disclosure rather than the identifier, and which did not make it into the reported bill.”
Stop getting big mad dude
This doesn’t actually meet any definition of AI slop? Other than I put the word “deepseek” in there.
You not understanding how a tool works or what AI slop is and just instantly getting triggered is the bigger issue.
You’re over applying the term and probably need to go outside for a walk.