And after 10 years of this going on, they finally did something against it. Unfortunately the wrong thing. They don't show pre-screening ratings anymore, amassing the cheater ratings then to the public on the Premiere day. Pretty hard to catch them this way. They should catch and block them before.
imdb had the very same problem before, but nobody trusts imdb ratings anyway.
metacritic and rotten-tomatoes don't need cheaters en masse, they just need to pay one or two popular "influencers".
RateYourMusic has a great algorithm I think - they assign rating weights to users depending on how their rating distribution looks like, so anybody who rates everything with 5/5 would have zero weight.
Having such a high profile film rating site be potentially owned by a film studio has serious conflict of interest issues. Same goes for amazon buying imdb and they've already used that to adjust scores for at least one film they released because of bad reviews. I'm happy to see this get some attention here after my submission didn't because the potential implications of this purchase are big.
Ah sorry I should have linked from the start instead of being kind of handwavy so people can make their own call on the event I was thinking about. It was in reaction to review bombing of The Little Mermaid.
I'm actually pretty fond of the general concept of smoothing out most review bombing but the fact that imdb ran ages without this feature, they only implemented it when one of their films had issues, that they aren't open about the specifics and stand to quietly benefit from manipulations like this has me petty uncomfortable.
The problem with Amazon owning IMDB, or A24 potentially owning Letterboxd, is not that they would screw with it, but that every move they make will be put through that lease. Even with NYT being the owners I’m sure there would be the regular ‘drama’ of whatever woke/anti-woke influence they may have over it.
Ah actually unfortunately I think I made a mistake there so I apologize for that. Should have double checked instead of speaking from memory. I believe I was thinking of The Little Mermaid change but it seems like that wasn't their film. Sorry!
Oh is that a claude thing? Definitively a false positive in this case and I don't care much for ai in general. Pretty damn awkward that I might need to memorize ai text styles even though I don't use them so I don't accidentally write the same way as one of them.
Truly, everything good gets milked dry for someone's exit. I know that's usually celebrated in a forum like this, but is it possible things are just a bit out of balance?
If it's bought by A24 or Sony that's absolutely gonna be a conflict on interest and I cannot imagine the platform would ever be impartial for the reviews of their movies. It NYT buys it, then it would be turned into a woke nonsense project. I guess all good things must come to an end.
I continue to be baffled by this sale. Letterboxd was acquired by Tiny 3 years ago, Tiny’s entire premise is that they hold for the long term. Selling after 3 years is not long term. I don’t understand why Tiny would undermine their raison d’aitre unless it’s because the founders (who retain a minority stake) are pushing for it.
Tiny just recently updated their website to emphasize how long they’ve owned each property which is especially confusing given they’re now offloading things https://tiny.com/companies/letterboxd
“Tiny's model — long-term ownership, founder autonomy, no pressure to flip the company in three to five years — fit naturally.”
America hasn’t had real antitrust law for >40 years. It should be impossible for a review site to be purchased by a company that makes things reviewed on that site. Reagan era neoliberalism defanged antitrust, and brought on the corpo-hellscape we live in today.
36 comments
[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 46.5 ms ] threadimdb had the very same problem before, but nobody trusts imdb ratings anyway.
metacritic and rotten-tomatoes don't need cheaters en masse, they just need to pay one or two popular "influencers".
https://rateyourmusic.com/wiki/RYM:Weighting+FAQ
Dear God, don't let Amazon do what it did to Goodreads here.
Any source on that ? I found nothing serious, just reddit and Facebook post. No one serious is reporting on it.
https://www.avclub.com/the-little-mermaid-imdb-changes-ratin...
I'm actually pretty fond of the general concept of smoothing out most review bombing but the fact that imdb ran ages without this feature, they only implemented it when one of their films had issues, that they aren't open about the specifics and stand to quietly benefit from manipulations like this has me petty uncomfortable.
https://www.avclub.com/the-little-mermaid-imdb-changes-ratin...
Claude :)
It's a sign that the developers built a product with demand.
Related background on the state of growth there from a few months ago:
The Rise and (Potential) Fall of Letterboxd
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48463894
service letterboxd enable; service letterboxd start
Tiny just recently updated their website to emphasize how long they’ve owned each property which is especially confusing given they’re now offloading things https://tiny.com/companies/letterboxd
“Tiny's model — long-term ownership, founder autonomy, no pressure to flip the company in three to five years — fit naturally.”
…?
At a $300M sale, the project achieved its goal and it's time to exit.