> The domain of internal constraints is the domain of integrity
and creativity, the problem of solving for the best case
scenarios and leveraging everything we can leverage to do so
First, the essay itself is positioned as an artwork in a larger set of art releases, it's sort of also speaking to it's own mode of production.
The assertion positions creativity as dependent on constraints as opposed to being unbounded. - which I believe is quite relevant, especially to approaching art (or anything) in 2026.
The contemporary canon of abstract art is informed by movements that started in the 1800s (I'd personally position Manet in front of it) and have been subsequently constrained more and more by the need to "speak" some truth while also manufacturing a branded stylistic identity.
A brushstroke doesn't come from nowhere, it's informed by a decision. That decision is informed by a constraint. The brushstroke is evidence of the constraint, but also the decision made in the face of it. (Does it pretend the constraint doesn't exist? Does it accommodate the constraint? Does it push back and how?)
A banal example of an internal constraint would be "I made a song that was anti-capitalist. Do I put it on spotify and market it to sustain revenues, or would that muffle/negate the artistic voice of the track?" Maybe going out in the street and performing it over a boombox would be a more creative approach to that specific constraint.
The essay uses math and technical domains to describe decision points _for_ creative/ethical solutions without asserting what those solutions should be. Most creative/ethics efforts tend _away_ from these modes, and I'd argue they aren't very creative or ethical at all.
2 comments
[ 0.20 ms ] story [ 9.3 ms ] thread> The domain of internal constraints is the domain of integrity and creativity, the problem of solving for the best case scenarios and leveraging everything we can leverage to do so
First, the essay itself is positioned as an artwork in a larger set of art releases, it's sort of also speaking to it's own mode of production.
The assertion positions creativity as dependent on constraints as opposed to being unbounded. - which I believe is quite relevant, especially to approaching art (or anything) in 2026.
The contemporary canon of abstract art is informed by movements that started in the 1800s (I'd personally position Manet in front of it) and have been subsequently constrained more and more by the need to "speak" some truth while also manufacturing a branded stylistic identity.
A brushstroke doesn't come from nowhere, it's informed by a decision. That decision is informed by a constraint. The brushstroke is evidence of the constraint, but also the decision made in the face of it. (Does it pretend the constraint doesn't exist? Does it accommodate the constraint? Does it push back and how?)
A banal example of an internal constraint would be "I made a song that was anti-capitalist. Do I put it on spotify and market it to sustain revenues, or would that muffle/negate the artistic voice of the track?" Maybe going out in the street and performing it over a boombox would be a more creative approach to that specific constraint.
The essay uses math and technical domains to describe decision points _for_ creative/ethical solutions without asserting what those solutions should be. Most creative/ethics efforts tend _away_ from these modes, and I'd argue they aren't very creative or ethical at all.