[–] conartist6 20d ago ↗ AI?Used the exact same rhetorical device twice in three sentences. A human writer would have added emphasis to the second occurrence at least...I generally quit reading when I see signs the author has never read their own work [–] lukeasrodgers 20d ago ↗ I did not get that impression at all. What rhetorical device are you referring to? [–] conartist6 20d ago ↗ Maybe not. I misread the structure. Look for "required reading" and you'll find the two sentences.
[–] lukeasrodgers 20d ago ↗ I did not get that impression at all. What rhetorical device are you referring to? [–] conartist6 20d ago ↗ Maybe not. I misread the structure. Look for "required reading" and you'll find the two sentences.
[–] conartist6 20d ago ↗ Maybe not. I misread the structure. Look for "required reading" and you'll find the two sentences.
[–] Apocryphon 20d ago ↗ Never knew of Golding’s post-Flies bibliography. Sounds like it’s worth diving into! And wonder if his relationship to Monteith is worth some sort of dramatization.
7 comments
[ 3.6 ms ] story [ 10.3 ms ] threadUsed the exact same rhetorical device twice in three sentences. A human writer would have added emphasis to the second occurrence at least...
I generally quit reading when I see signs the author has never read their own work