[–] zylent 22d ago ↗ 100% AI according to pangram. Article collapse or blog collapse is more accurate. [–] ChrisLTD 21d ago ↗ Pangram told me 89%.In any event, I thought it was pretty readable, unlike most AI slop posts we’re subjected to these days. [–] solarkraft 21d ago ↗ That’s the difference between AI generated / assisted and slop, which is usually AI generated nowadays but also existed before. [–] hovhannesian 21d ago ↗ Its interesting how people are interesting in "gotcha its AI" more than actually reading. [–] ragall 21d ago ↗ We're interested in people's idea, while AI-generated text is just junk.
[–] ChrisLTD 21d ago ↗ Pangram told me 89%.In any event, I thought it was pretty readable, unlike most AI slop posts we’re subjected to these days. [–] solarkraft 21d ago ↗ That’s the difference between AI generated / assisted and slop, which is usually AI generated nowadays but also existed before.
[–] solarkraft 21d ago ↗ That’s the difference between AI generated / assisted and slop, which is usually AI generated nowadays but also existed before.
[–] hovhannesian 21d ago ↗ Its interesting how people are interesting in "gotcha its AI" more than actually reading. [–] ragall 21d ago ↗ We're interested in people's idea, while AI-generated text is just junk.
[–] hackersnooze1 21d ago ↗ This article has almost zero substance at all and I have a very strong feeling it was written by AI
6 comments
[ 2.4 ms ] story [ 20.7 ms ] threadIn any event, I thought it was pretty readable, unlike most AI slop posts we’re subjected to these days.