Qualcomm Legally Proves Arm Breached Its License, Wins $2 (techpowerup.com) 2 points by LorenDB 12d ago ↗ HN
[–] tester756 12d ago ↗ Why people are not talking about the REAL winners?How much lawyers made! [–] jubilanti 12d ago ↗ Classic HN low-effort first post that could be written from just the headline.The real issue is not the damages, but:> whether Arm's breach lets Qualcomm stop paying royalties under the ALA for five years, which, by some estimates, could be worth billions of dollarsWhich is the next decision for the court. It is a clickbait headline, shame on the author too. [–] tester756 12d ago ↗ Of course this this whole thing is bigger than that, but that "$1"figure appearing everywhere around this topic makes it look funny and cute and that's what I wanted to joke about
[–] jubilanti 12d ago ↗ Classic HN low-effort first post that could be written from just the headline.The real issue is not the damages, but:> whether Arm's breach lets Qualcomm stop paying royalties under the ALA for five years, which, by some estimates, could be worth billions of dollarsWhich is the next decision for the court. It is a clickbait headline, shame on the author too. [–] tester756 12d ago ↗ Of course this this whole thing is bigger than that, but that "$1"figure appearing everywhere around this topic makes it look funny and cute and that's what I wanted to joke about
[–] tester756 12d ago ↗ Of course this this whole thing is bigger than that, but that "$1"figure appearing everywhere around this topic makes it look funny and cute and that's what I wanted to joke about
[–] jubilanti 12d ago ↗ The real issue is not the damages, but:> whether Arm's breach lets Qualcomm stop paying royalties under the ALA for five years, which, by some estimates, could be worth billions of dollarsWhich is the next decision for the court. It is a clickbait headline, shame on the author too.(Reposting this as a top level comment in case the low effort one I reply to gets downvoted)
[–] pavel_lishin 12d ago ↗ Finally, a corporation gets to have the same sort of class-action-lawsuit experience that we common folk do! [–] sidewndr46 12d ago ↗ It'd be payable in a visa card if that was the case [–] gumby 11d ago ↗ Apple gift cards
[–] sidewndr46 12d ago ↗ It'd be payable in a visa card if that was the case [–] gumby 11d ago ↗ Apple gift cards
[–] ChrisArchitect 12d ago ↗ Source: https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/qualcomm-says-jury-...(https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50077246)
[–] WheelsAtLarge 12d ago ↗ Why the FU to Qualcomm? Obviously the Jury/Judge did not think there was much economic damage but how about Non-Economic Damages? I would think that there would be some of those?
10 comments
[ 8.4 ms ] story [ 57.2 ms ] threadHow much lawyers made!
The real issue is not the damages, but:
> whether Arm's breach lets Qualcomm stop paying royalties under the ALA for five years, which, by some estimates, could be worth billions of dollars
Which is the next decision for the court. It is a clickbait headline, shame on the author too.
figure appearing everywhere around this topic makes it look funny and cute and that's what I wanted to joke about
> whether Arm's breach lets Qualcomm stop paying royalties under the ALA for five years, which, by some estimates, could be worth billions of dollars
Which is the next decision for the court. It is a clickbait headline, shame on the author too.
(Reposting this as a top level comment in case the low effort one I reply to gets downvoted)
(https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50077246)