>The proposed language said, “AI features may make mistakes and may not always produce accurate, complete, or suitable results,” and customers “are solely responsible for and assume any and all risks associated with such AI features and any resulting content.”
How about as a society we just start throwing people who work at meta into federal pound-me-in-the-ass prison until they get the message. From the top down.
Not a legal expert, but that sounds like a trojan horse. Does this mean if a bad actor were to use Meta's model, that if they bypass the safegaurds that they get off scot-free?
So I guess if I'm a contractor and doing a job for Meta, not only can I completely fail and they still pay me but if I do something illegal it's on them for hiring me, right??
Yeah I don't know what the solution is but something is wrong here.
Maybe refund mistakes or take responsibility.
There's no paradox, there never were agents to begin with. Those are programs. It's same old software. If you sell me a software to do X and you fail to deliver, it's on you.
13 comments
[ 20.1 ms ] story [ 92.6 ms ] threadHow about as a society we just start throwing people who work at meta into federal pound-me-in-the-ass prison until they get the message. From the top down.
Yeah I don't know what the solution is but something is wrong here. Maybe refund mistakes or take responsibility.
Right?