[I guess you are the author of the second link (posted in Zenodo).]
I probably need a whole month to understand the details, but if you want my opinion after reading it for 15 minutes ...
The problem with the second one is that is uses the electronic potentials that are different from the nuclear potentials. The spherical symmetry causes a similar structure of the protons and neutrons inside the nuclei, the s->2, p->6, d-> 10, ... but the order of them is different and the big gaps are different.
For electrons:
For a single electron atom (like H, He+, Li++, ...) the order is 1s, 2s=2p, 3s=3p=3d, ... and there are a lot of degererancy.
For a real atom with multiple electrons, the order is 1s, 2s, 2p, 3s, 3p, 4s, 3d, 3p, ... but there are a lot of special cases like Cu. Most of the big gaps are after the p layers and the noble gas.
For protons and neutrons:
There are still the s, p, d, f, ... layers, but the order and the gaps is different. They are even different fon protons and neutrons. I don't remember the details.
If the idea of the second paper is to reuse the s, p, d, f, ... layers it's fine, but there may be weird case I don't know. If the idea is to reuse the big gaps on the noble gas of the electronic structure, I'd be skeptical.
4 comments
[ 0.26 ms ] story [ 13.6 ms ] threadI probably need a whole month to understand the details, but if you want my opinion after reading it for 15 minutes ...
The problem with the second one is that is uses the electronic potentials that are different from the nuclear potentials. The spherical symmetry causes a similar structure of the protons and neutrons inside the nuclei, the s->2, p->6, d-> 10, ... but the order of them is different and the big gaps are different.
For electrons:
For a single electron atom (like H, He+, Li++, ...) the order is 1s, 2s=2p, 3s=3p=3d, ... and there are a lot of degererancy.
For a real atom with multiple electrons, the order is 1s, 2s, 2p, 3s, 3p, 4s, 3d, 3p, ... but there are a lot of special cases like Cu. Most of the big gaps are after the p layers and the noble gas.
For protons and neutrons:
There are still the s, p, d, f, ... layers, but the order and the gaps is different. They are even different fon protons and neutrons. I don't remember the details.
There are big gaps, but they are different from the gaps in the electronic structure https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_number_(physics)
If the idea of the second paper is to reuse the s, p, d, f, ... layers it's fine, but there may be weird case I don't know. If the idea is to reuse the big gaps on the noble gas of the electronic structure, I'd be skeptical.