10 comments

[ 0.24 ms ] story [ 35.6 ms ] thread
Was this simplified version made by AI, or did a real person write it?
The title is hard to understand. It's not disputing that ETH is false. It simplifies the proof that ETH is indeed false.
Author seems to be a serial liar who takes AI work and “publishes” it. His website says he’s an AI architect, speaker, blockchain expert, author (he self-inserted into his book, with AI images of himself) and experienced in dozens of disparate disciplines. A section on “Students” at Princeton despite never being a professor there, and none of the linked papers mention him and their years don’t match.
And all this slop is feed straight back into the LLMs that produced it.
> A section on “Students” at Princeton despite never being a professor there

Author was once a lecturer/TA at Princeton.

This is within hours of the original result. No way this can be reliable, can it?