Recently, I fine-tuned a small local model for 15 minutes on my own writing. In different instances it is able to have Pangram detect it as 100% human. What are your thoughts? Video: https://lnkd.in/p/dSwieQey
Who cares? I don't care what Pangram says, I care about quality writing, with Ai usage or not. Only super anti-Ai people use that site and they ignore all the false positives it produces. It's a site the dog pilers use
Well difficult discussion I feel. On the one hand you could say it is like people writing assembly code => not really needed for the majority of programmers anymore. On the other hand I do feel writing text yourself means also you took more time about the content. So honestly more on the critical side of things in regards to fully AI generated texts
It seems like this fine-tune is to use full-auto writing but not get caught, is that right?
Good writing is about organizing your thinking, structuring your arguments, and making a compelling read for your audience. The writing time can be very quick if you have been thinking about something for a long time.
The problem with Ai writing is the outsourcing of thinking
So you believe I cannot train a model to organize text like I would? This is about given people an AI-identity rather than not getting caught. In fact, I believe people will not need to write much in the future
No, I don't believe transformers are up to the task, just like for coding. It takes someone who knows about a thing for an Ai to be good at a thing. In other words, Ai does not make experts, Ai enhances experts. You still have to put in the human work to become expert.
5 comments
[ 0.14 ms ] story [ 16.8 ms ] threadGood writing is about organizing your thinking, structuring your arguments, and making a compelling read for your audience. The writing time can be very quick if you have been thinking about something for a long time.
The problem with Ai writing is the outsourcing of thinking