WikiLeaks: Aaron Swartz assisted WikiLeaks, may have been a source (twitter.com) 15 points by MacsHeadroom 13y ago ↗ HN
[–] MacsHeadroom 13y ago ↗ "Due to the investigation into the Secret Service involvement with #AaronSwartz we have decided to disclose the following facts (1-3) "https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/292503580135538688"1. Aaron Swartz assisted WikiLeaks #aaronwartz (1/3)"https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/292503892569239552"2. Aaron Swartz was in communication with Julian Assange, including during 2010 and 2011"https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/292504484016439296"3. We have strong reasons to believe, but cannot prove, that Aaron Swartz was a WikiLeaks source. #aaronswartz"https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/292504975865692160
[–] drucken 13y ago ↗ So Wikileak's famed "Anonymity for sources" does not extend to them if they are dead?Poor show, Wikileaks (assuming the Twitter account poster is in fact associated with Wikileaks).
4 comments
[ 2.6 ms ] story [ 32.4 ms ] threadhttps://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/292503580135538688
"1. Aaron Swartz assisted WikiLeaks #aaronwartz (1/3)"
https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/292503892569239552
"2. Aaron Swartz was in communication with Julian Assange, including during 2010 and 2011"
https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/292504484016439296
"3. We have strong reasons to believe, but cannot prove, that Aaron Swartz was a WikiLeaks source. #aaronswartz"
https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/292504975865692160
Poor show, Wikileaks (assuming the Twitter account poster is in fact associated with Wikileaks).