3 comments

[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 14.7 ms ] thread
US law seems absolutely insane.
And that document was written in 1997. Think of all the post 9/11 crap that's in place now. I'd love to see a more recent account of "the system" from a convicted hacker.
I found this to be the most interesting, and infurating part. A true testimate to 'the system's' reactionary ignorance. This part pertains to PROBATION, after already being released from prison:

As a hacker you may find that your access to work with, or possession of computer equipment may be restricted. While this may sound pragmatic to the public, in practice it serves no other purpose that to punish and limit a former hacker's ability t o support himself. With computers at libraries, copy shops, schools, and virtually everywhere, it's much like restricting someone who used a car to get to and from a bank robbery to not ever drive again. If a hacker is predisposed to hacking he's going to be able to do it with or without restrictions. In reality many hackers don't even need a computer to achieve their goals. As you probably know a phone and a little social engineering go a long way.