I worked in a company that did this, because of the slightly different business requirements they had regarding "publishing" on demand. Needless to say, it didnt end well.
Reinventing replication is usually a sign of poor application architecture; change the code, not the concept of replication.
2 comments
[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 14.5 ms ] threadI worked in a company that did this, because of the slightly different business requirements they had regarding "publishing" on demand. Needless to say, it didnt end well.
Reinventing replication is usually a sign of poor application architecture; change the code, not the concept of replication.