I wish people would stop posting this thoroughly debunked "news item". The original paper describes a sloppy procedure in which field-contaminated samples were analyzed and unsurprisingly discovered traces of both human and animal DNA, and the results were published in a hastily created non-journal after all the real science journals refused to publish it. Details here:
2 comments
[ 2.1 ms ] story [ 12.1 ms ] thread> she says she bought an existing journal and renamed it .... So she owns the journal. It’s now called De Novo.
> Then she came out with a special edition. It’s Volume 1, Issue 1. It contains precisely one paper, hers.
I've confirmed that denovojournal.com has this as its only publication.
http://science.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/02/14/16964023-bigfoot...