Paul Krugman: In Despair Over Obama's Financial Rescue Plan (krugman.blogs.nytimes.com) 33 points by limeade 17y ago ↗ HN
[–] j2d2 17y ago ↗ Articles like this might be better suited for newmogul.com run by the infamous nickb. [–] asdlfj2sd 17y ago ↗ I liked that article a lot but I agree I'd prefer to see it at newmogul or the economics reddit. [–] DenisM 17y ago ↗ Infamous - "Having an exceedingly bad reputation; notorious."What's so bad about nickb? He seems like a real nice fellow... [–] jibiki 17y ago ↗ I can't figure out where you're coming from here. People I know use "infamous" facetiously all the time, and I almost never hear it used literally. [–] sho 17y ago ↗ Agreed, and "notorious" has also lost its perjorative skew. [–] DenisM 17y ago ↗ I'm coming from the dictionary, which I cited. [–] j2d2 17y ago ↗ NickB is great. It was meant to be facetious because of his rank in the leaders list.
[–] asdlfj2sd 17y ago ↗ I liked that article a lot but I agree I'd prefer to see it at newmogul or the economics reddit.
[–] DenisM 17y ago ↗ Infamous - "Having an exceedingly bad reputation; notorious."What's so bad about nickb? He seems like a real nice fellow... [–] jibiki 17y ago ↗ I can't figure out where you're coming from here. People I know use "infamous" facetiously all the time, and I almost never hear it used literally. [–] sho 17y ago ↗ Agreed, and "notorious" has also lost its perjorative skew. [–] DenisM 17y ago ↗ I'm coming from the dictionary, which I cited. [–] j2d2 17y ago ↗ NickB is great. It was meant to be facetious because of his rank in the leaders list.
[–] jibiki 17y ago ↗ I can't figure out where you're coming from here. People I know use "infamous" facetiously all the time, and I almost never hear it used literally. [–] sho 17y ago ↗ Agreed, and "notorious" has also lost its perjorative skew. [–] DenisM 17y ago ↗ I'm coming from the dictionary, which I cited.
[–] j2d2 17y ago ↗ NickB is great. It was meant to be facetious because of his rank in the leaders list.
[–] nazgulnarsil 17y ago ↗ how did this get 31 points? is there a group gaming the upvotes now? [–] chaosmachine 17y ago ↗ I don't think NYTimes would have much to gain from gaming HN. [–] nazgulnarsil 17y ago ↗ well we now have proof that at least 31 idiots browse the site. what part of "hacker news" do people not understand? "hacker" presumably.
[–] chaosmachine 17y ago ↗ I don't think NYTimes would have much to gain from gaming HN. [–] nazgulnarsil 17y ago ↗ well we now have proof that at least 31 idiots browse the site. what part of "hacker news" do people not understand? "hacker" presumably.
[–] nazgulnarsil 17y ago ↗ well we now have proof that at least 31 idiots browse the site. what part of "hacker news" do people not understand? "hacker" presumably.
11 comments
[ 0.86 ms ] story [ 43.4 ms ] threadWhat's so bad about nickb? He seems like a real nice fellow...