In this article Forbes talks about how programmers are basically the safest and smartest investment an entrepreneur can make, but now they are saying that investing the time to learn to program yourself is a waste of time?
I could understand if the headline and tone of the article was something like "could learning to program compliment your current skills?", but right off the bat they are attacking the idea of acquiring a new skill.
Does anyone really come out worse off if they miss a season of American Idol to learn programming instead?
Learning is never a waste of time.
If it is not valuable for your work and your goal , you will not go as far as masterize it and stop it. So not loosing so much time but just opened your mind to other way to think.
Either a foreign language, a book, a programming language...
To answer the article, learning what will not be our everyday job is called "curiosity, knowledge and culture"
The author is basically saying that having a good reason for learning something means you're much more likely to complete your course of study.
My guess is that less than half the people who signed up for Codecademy’s Code Year challenge will finish, it will be closer to 10-15%. I’m not being harsh, I’m being realistic. Most of the people that signed up don’t really know why they are learning to code, they just think it’s a good idea. Jumping right into learning JavaScript, the ‘beginner-friendly’ language without first knowing why you want to learn it, seems like a recipe for abandonment.
She's just presenting the message from a very pessimistic vantage.
People like this confuse the positive encouragement of the general public with their own needs. The recent code.org campaign is simply a campaign that is trying to encourage young kids and schools to pony up because there are tons of jobs going unfilled and they will continue to go unfilled if the education system doesn't catch up.
Misleading title -- the point is that having an item on your to-do list 'learning how to code' is not as useful as something more specific, say 'learn javascript to start work on my own blogging platform' ... essentially it's an article on better goal creation/identification
The World As An API ------
Writing was not considered important for the average person back in the day. You could get a job on the farm or some kind of manufacturing job and it was therefore not a necessity to survive in the real world. It was still valued but it was something for the rich. As time moved on and technology changed, so did work requirements, as the economy grew from substance and agricultural based to industrial and then to services based, the type of skills also moved from manual labor to more intellectual labor. The economy is changing again, becoming more information technology based, also with the internet of things increasing, our homes will become more tech based. We will move to a future where everything has an API, from your washing machine to your nike's and to be able to make small customization's, you will need basic programming skills. Basic Programming is the new Writing and Reading. My kids will learn basic programming whether they like to or not.
10 comments
[ 5.5 ms ] story [ 54.8 ms ] threadIts so strange to see one specific skill being targeted.
Even stranger: http://www.forbes.com/sites/venkateshrao/2011/12/05/the-rise...
In this article Forbes talks about how programmers are basically the safest and smartest investment an entrepreneur can make, but now they are saying that investing the time to learn to program yourself is a waste of time?
I could understand if the headline and tone of the article was something like "could learning to program compliment your current skills?", but right off the bat they are attacking the idea of acquiring a new skill.
Does anyone really come out worse off if they miss a season of American Idol to learn programming instead?
To answer the article, learning what will not be our everyday job is called "curiosity, knowledge and culture"
My guess is that less than half the people who signed up for Codecademy’s Code Year challenge will finish, it will be closer to 10-15%. I’m not being harsh, I’m being realistic. Most of the people that signed up don’t really know why they are learning to code, they just think it’s a good idea. Jumping right into learning JavaScript, the ‘beginner-friendly’ language without first knowing why you want to learn it, seems like a recipe for abandonment.
She's just presenting the message from a very pessimistic vantage.
Edit: She not he....