Ask HN: We launched our startup (GroupieGuide) today. What do you think?
We requested feedback on HN when we first launched our private alpha. We launched publicly today with a new interactive theme designer, group subscription with integrated e-mail, and a bunch of usability fixes. What do you think?
21 comments
[ 4.1 ms ] story [ 65.0 ms ] threadhttp://thegroupies.groupieguide.com/ http://fixie.groupieguide.com/ http://cohitre.groupieguide.com/ http://stptraining.groupieguide.com/
http://seattlehackers.groupieguide.com/login
p: welcome
What are you going to say? How are you going to win? How will you overcome the customer lock in at established competitors?
Both ning and tangler focus on building online social interactions through the website. We are trying to cater to the users that have been ignored by social networks.
But I would need to be convinced why I should use these groups instead of Facebook Groups, when my friends and I are already all on Facebook.
But the value prop of what features I would need that Facebook Group doesn't have isn't prominent enough.
Likewise with the six sample uses under create a website to - if recruit readers for a book club is listed as a suggested use, and it's visually presented as a button-shaped thing, I expect to be able to click on it and see a demo (either live example site or screenshot) of what it would look like if I chose to use your site for that purpose.
Having a GetSatisfaction link on individual group pages is unclear - is the user being invited to give feedback on the individual page, the group, or the service in general.
When editing a group's page, have some easy way to see what the thing will look like when viewed by a normal, non-logged in user - the same idea as Facebook's feature to see what your profile looks like when viewed by someone else.
Also, maybe some more explaining what the service is. Until I got to the screen below the fold, I thought the site would be a way for a band's groupies to organize themselves, or for the best strategies to become a groupie.
Also I'm curious to know what problem this solves or how much demand is really out there for this product. Need a site? Google Sites does the job well. Need a discussion group? Facebook Groups has that covered. Need to collaborate? Google Docs, Google Calendar, E-mail, all fit the bill fine.
If you're main pull is to provide custom design/branding, then why are users held to the GroupieGuide domain? Doesn't it defeat the purpose?
I interact with a research group on a day to day basis, but I simply did not see enough value for me to create a presence on your site. Maybe I missed the point--in which case you need to make it more clear why your product is not for me.
We picked features that are useful for non-techies and made them accessible through a single interface.
It looks very polished and professionally designed.