Ask HN: Why don't more people use GrubHub, Foodler, etc?
These services allow you to order food online for delivery, instead of calling. However, these services don't get much use, which doesn't make sense to me. This is counter to ordering Domino's pizza online, which seems to get more use.
Why are these services not so popular? Is it just that people feel more comfortable dealing directly with the restaurant?
17 comments
[ 2.9 ms ] story [ 68.6 ms ] threadWhile not a direct indicator of success, I assume this means they are posting some encouraging numbers.
I think a lot of restaurants don't join these services, because it costs them money on each order, and they have to find a way to deliver the food, which is a distraction. For this reason, these services sometimes have the least common denominator in terms of the restaurants that are willing to deliver (i.e. restaurants that don't get enough real world traffic).
What evidence do you have that these services aren't popular, and how do you define popular?
And foodler... didn't look legit enough to give my address to.
I would love to use a site like this, I do order pizza online when I can. The problem is that awesome services like this generally take hold in the west coast and will make it to Ohio... probably never.
I think the reason why factors like this are important is that, all things being equal, people would rather dine in a restaurant if they're going to pay "eating out" prices. When you go to a restaurant, of course, you are paying for more than the food. You are also paying for (hopefully) a nice atmosphere and a feeling of relaxation and wealth. It's also nice to get out of the house/office.
Oddly enough, I draw an analogy to RSS readers. (Which has been on my mind recently for obvious reasons.) The thing that people overlook about RSS is that the value of a website is in more than just paragraphs of text. Websites are also designed to create a certain kind of experience. The premise that underlies this design work, of course, is that design adds value for the user beyond just the words on the page. But that added value is stripped away when content is consumed through an RSS feed. The question then becomes whether the added convenience (etc.) of aggregation into a feed outweighs the value lost.
Similarly, the question for GrubHub users is whether the loss of the secondary benefits of eating in a restaurant (and add to that, of course, the small additional monetary expense) are made up for by the added convenience. Evidently most people feel that it is not.
Love, love, love Eat24.
Also, a personal anecdote... I reported a CSS bug to Eat24 and they gave me $100 in food credit. I'm not affiliated with them in any way besides being a customer.
I would imagine if you deal directly with restaurant, and they make a mistake, it's easier to solve it than if there's a third party in the middle.
I never buy $350 jeans from any brick-and-mortar or online stores that sell such jeans, but I'm pretty sure that doesn't mean these services are "not so popular" and "don't get much use".