8 comments

[ 3.8 ms ] story [ 30.9 ms ] thread
This horribly written article treats the phrase "control freak" as if it's a term the general public knows.
I read it as "(cloud control) (freak appliance)".
I have no idea why a software platform company is selling hardware.

What does this thing do? Orchestrate rightscale?

"a software platform company"? Who's that then? Nebula's first (and as far as I am aware, only) commercial offering is... a hardware appliance!
Yeah, that's correct, we're a computer systems company. We're making hardware, and the software that goes on it.
I wrote up a long post wondering about the efficacy of deploying an openstack solution that combines so many features into one box (the network (quantum?) and controller)... and then I read further down into the article that the price per unit is expected to be $100,000??

I question exactly who in this space is going to pay that kind of fee when you can get a distributed solution from a company like Piston for a much lower cost (also, you're distributing more in a case like this).

The ability to have everything in one plug-and-play device is quite tempting but also runs kind of counter to the general OpenStack environment in many ways.

In the market I think they are aiming at, $100,000 is quite reasonable or even cheap if it can deliver a plug and play private cloud that can scale out to 5 PB.
Thinking about it on the other hand I suppose that is indeed true. I'm with a couple other posters on the other threat though and wondering how they plan to have this truly HA.