59 comments

[ 6.5 ms ] story [ 123 ms ] thread
I designed a slightly new Hacker News. Comment and let me know what you think.
pretty slick and nice! like it very much. it would be awesome if PG or someone takes time to get your design ported to the real HN :D
I usually visit http://hckrnews.com, I like the clean design there... But yours is a nice effort
Nice, clean and easy on the eyes. Showing the right information in the right place, cool.
My favourite too, simple, clean, and shows everything in an order that makes more sense. The latest changes to the site were excellent improvements as well!
One of the things I like about the existing Hacker News design is that it's simple and very easy to read. Your redesign uses smaller fonts, which, in my opinion, is definitely not an improvement.
Support this statement! Design that sacrifices content for sake of nice looking white-spaces can be used only on personal pages that nobody reads.
Whitespace doesn't exist just for the sake of being pretty. At least to me I find this mockup much more readable than the current design, as the space between links clearly separates them. This makes it much easier to read their titles.
I agree. My intention is to use white space to separate things, vs lines or other graphical distractions. Having said that, I still need to work on the list part of the design.
There will be less white space and it will be used more scarcely, however I'd rather use a little bit of white space instead of something like a horizontal line. Wouldn't you agree with this? :P
Except for the god-awful vote buttons. They're even still image files as well.
Really? On my computer it's the exact opposite. The HN design looks like the font is around 8pt; the redesign looks like it's around 11pt.
The real HN has 10pt titles and 7pt metadata, at least on my PC.

The redesign makes titles smaller and metadata larger, in effect making them the same size.

I think this is a bad change, because now there's little distinction between title and metadata.

I want to remove the metadata if I can. Would you agree that the titles and "comhead" (the domain name) should be the visually promenant part? My goal is to minimize on the meta as much as possible without removing the usefulness of it.
I opened up two, identical browsers (Chromium version 25) on my 27 inch IPS monitor. I opened up the redesign in one browser, and the regular Hacker News in the other. The redesign has visually, noticeably smaller fonts.
The font size is the same size for me. I do like the increased padding on the design.
Looks good, I think fonts are too narrow. author name can be greyed out.
This is how I use it: http://i.imgur.com/uwKcrn5.png
This one is better. But still two things remain: 1. the font is a little tad too big by my preference. 2. The orange is a little too bright.

It seems this is editable, I will check back later to add my perception of HN.

hard to call it a redesign when it doesn't solve any problems.
It does by making important elements stand out (such as author, comments...). Bigger arrow which is sometimes tricky to hit.

The colors kinda kills the eyes though.

Author (submitter, really) and comments are the last two things I care about.
Yes, the nice thing about HN is the de-emphasis of the submitter...the content should stand on its own, not on the authority of whoever submitted it.

Number of upvotes is also irrelevant to emphasize. This attribute is inherently reflected in the vertical position of the item.

Edit: oops, OP did not emphasize upvotes. I'm ambivalent about holding number of comments...again, the number of them can mean several conflicting things

Really like it visually, but I don't think there's enough attention on the actual titles. The eye doesn't catch the titles enough.
I love the classic design :)
Me, too. I hope it never goes away in favour of flavour-of-the-month web design.

There's just enough space between articles and a ton of stuff fits on the screen at once. If it's not to your liking, there's a ton of alternative HN design services out there you can use.

Zooming in breaks the layout.
Perhaps related, on a Nexus 7 titles that wrap cause the comments line to lose their indentation.
The problem is that if you go for a clean (read: white-heavy) design, then you end up with black text on white background. I prefer the classic HN purely because it is (to me) a bit milder on the eye. Kudos for trying though.
Any redesign should make the voting buttons significantly larger. It is really hard to hit them on a tablet.
lol. I've been reading hackernews for years and didn't even know there was a voting button
Agreed. Having feedback that the vote counted would be helpful as well. When I was getting used to my new tablet I'd select them, so they'd vanish, but moving or touching elsewhere would show the buttons again. Odd.
Why did you use Arial narrow in the Header and Footer? In my opinion this looks a bit crammed.
Same but different. And ugly?!
seriously, did this come on HN front page? HN is sometimes crazy or biased i don't know what to say..
HN has a really nice hacker-ish design feel to it already so it's great. Just that it is not very tablet and mobile friendly with the really small buttons.
New version is hard on the eyes.
A bit too much spacing for my liking, though maybe I am just pissed that google chrome new design has everything very separated at the moment.