[–] okal 13y ago ↗ This looks interesting, but I'm not sure the creator understands how the MIT License works. [–] egeozcan 13y ago ↗ Exactly what I thought. I suppose the correct way would be to open source it under GPL and relieve the developer of the GPL's duties when a commercial license is purchased.
[–] egeozcan 13y ago ↗ Exactly what I thought. I suppose the correct way would be to open source it under GPL and relieve the developer of the GPL's duties when a commercial license is purchased.
2 comments
[ 3.2 ms ] story [ 14.0 ms ] thread