Ask HN: Scratched my own itch. Is one week too soon to pivot?
Hi everyone,
I've written a bit of software that I needed. I have packaged it and attempted to market it. http://www.virtsync.com
With a few hundred dollars spent on LinkedIn and Google Adwords, there have still been no downloads of the evaluation version.
Is the site broken, or did I just have a unique need? (I would have happily spent the $49 that I'm charging, if the software had already existed.)
Is there a way to turn this software into a profitable service, perhaps like rsync.net? Or should I just forget it and get on with the next project?
Any comments on the site, software or future direction would be very welcome.
Thanks,
Chris.
17 comments
[ 47.1 ms ] story [ 455 ms ] threadYes, sysadmins are the target market.
For example, at CloudFlare we are generating 20GB of log files per minute and we need to move these around. Finding a fast way to do that is important. Clearly, CloudFlare could pay $49 per machine without a problem.
Alternatively, but more difficult, track down some local IT integration specialists, resell through them.
All it costs is your time and possibly phone bills.
I'm no expert, but my gut feeling is that for this kind of tool - you need to offer a more 'enterprisey' offering. The way budgets for the kind of places that this tool would be useful are allocated, $49 for a single utility for every machine it might need to be run on is something that sysadmins might have difficulty explaining.
Bear in mind that the idea of syncing is not novel, and most sysadmins have built their servers around the current tools and constraints available. They are likely to look at your utility and think 'that's cool, but it's not worth the cost: what I have now works even if it takes longer, and I'm not paying anything for it'.
If you asked me to pay $49 for a faster version of rsync, which I then had to incorporate into my tool-chain, I'd probably just forget it. The cost of changing to a new utility is more than just the cost of the utility itself.
The difference is important when you have many 50GB VM disk images with just 2-3GB occupied (as I have).
Rsync doesn't support --sparse --inplace.
Also the virtsync command line is more similar to scp than rsync. No need for any configuration files - it uses ssh as its transport.
Are you looking for people with dedicated backup and recovery?
Are you looking for people without BaR but uses a lot of VMs?
Should I backup anything with this, or just my VMs and DBs? If so, how does it compare to [existing VM or DB backup system]
How does it compare to using rsync with hpn-ssh? Using hpn-ssh significantly improves rsync speeds, though I don't know how it works with sparse files since I use dedicated SAN backups for my VMs.