Poll: Where do you host your static website?

38 points by vikrum ↗ HN
Curious to know where the HN community hosts their static websites. If there's an option missing, leave a comment and I'll add it.

57 comments

[ 2.7 ms ] story [ 110 ms ] thread
I host http://blog.omgmog.net on GitHub pages, but I also use Jekyll to generate a bunch of static websites that I serve with Apache from my VPS.
(comment deleted)
Dreamhost. Probably there are better options now, but I have the account.
I've been using recently launched http://fjords.cc . Fjords paired with DNSimple.com has been a dream setup compared to what I previously used (Amazon S3 with Godaddy for domains).
Webfaction++
I struggled to put up a static generator over there I failed, I tried everything I could. Of course they were helpful but asking them to enable this, enable that every time is plain painful.

I also tried to setup ownCloud and didn't succed again. Finally I moved to vps and I set them up there with some difficulty and then I moved my static files back to Dropbox and left OwnCloud. It was too much trouble.

WebFaction ought to give options to do one click install of static generators and other packages like OwnCloud.

nearlyfreespeech.net
I started with NFSN and then switched to S3 after a while.
Same. Maybe this is evidence of how unpopular my site is, but I think I've paid a dollar or two over the last three years.
Me too. Large files are served from S3 though (using a CNAME).
Same but css/javascript etc is hosted via Rackspace CDN (Akamai).
I find Github to be the best option out there (the only thing I'd like to see is a method to leverage caching). Plus it allows you to make the website "open source" (which is the case for most of what I put up).
Please, add "Other shared hosting" - otherwise we would need thousands of options. I personally use servage.net
(Since HN has been in golang hype-mode recently:) a 20-line Go web server that I probably wrote in about 5 minutes but I don't remember because it's still chugging away.
I tried Dreamhost for a year (for my non serious sites and just personal testing purposes) because people raved about it on Reddit, but it was disappointing. I tracked all my sites using uptimerobot.com and Dreamhost has less than 99.9% up time consistently. Just signed up for asmallorange.com...will see how it goes.
bluehost.com - I don't remember why I chose them originally, but I have had my domains and hosting there for a while, and have been happy. I put a few sites on their lowest plan and they have "unlimited" space and bandwidth.
+1 for bluehost. I put my personal site on there and occasionally use it for other small projects. It's really good for what it is.
Fastmail.fm

They already provide my e-mail hosting (significantly better spam management than GMail, where about 20-30 were getting through per day) and static web hosting is included.

A Small Orange
Shared host - too many to name. All < $72/year
Dreamhost - but I wouldn't recommend it
Why so? For a shared hosting provider I've read around they are offering pretty good stuff. Anything specific?
I tried them for a year because of the great reviews on Reddit, but I was quite unhappy about it. Less than 99.9% up time monitored by uptimerobot.com. Some of my sites have less than 99.5% up time in fact. I'm monitoring some of my clients' sites on Siteground and they have better up time over there (>99.9%).
Manage my own Apache on a VDS provided by Other hosting provider.
(comment deleted)
I use a static site generator (Hakyll) and deploy directly to S3. It's a pretty awesome system.

I also used to use CloudFront as a CDN. I gave up because invalidating the cache was a bit tedious. I should start using it again for the assets that usually don't change like fonts. It's really not difficult; it was just inconvenient because I was using it for things like text that I updated constantly.

I've considered hosting my assets on a separate domain (e.g. assets.mydomain.com) because, in theory, browsers will better be able to parallelize the downloads. It sounds like this same approach would make your CloudFront setup a bit easier to manage.