Damn, you beat me. Right down to the line too. The last one--Czech Republic--made all the difference. Perhaps you know the language or something, you got it dead on.
We both bombed on South Africa and Australia, but I beat you for Utah and Russia :>
Tougher than it seems. It's not so bad when you're in a city and there's some kind of writing and architecture, but often as not you're in the middle of nowhwere and it's all guessing based on rocks and trees.
There's other things to look for. Are they driving on the left or right? Is the road dead straight (if so maybe Australia/USA?) Is the road line down the middle yellow (USA and I think SA) or white? etc.
Can't google shit, sure, but sure you can move. Just as if you were dropped somewhere on Earth and had to figure out. First tip to get is "do they drive left or right handed" :)
Question is, were you dropped somewhere with or without a smartphone? :-)
My personal rule is absolutely no googling. I've been tempted to print out a list of all the phone area codes and take it with me in my virtual alien-ship-to-random-destinations since that is something I could actually do were I preparing for such a scenario.
I don't play for the points. I play to be dropped in the middle of a place and explore a place I would have never seen. But I do google since it is fun to be right.
Once I was dropped on a logging road in Canada. It took about a hour to hit a paved road and another 15 minutes to find a sign announcing the logging road ahead. I found a sign and googled it. Even that was wrong. I thought I was in Oregon but was wrong.
I had the opposite experience: once I was dropped in Macau. Where else do you have signs in Portuguese and Chinese and a large baroque church in ruins? I had sub-kilometer precision without even moving.
I thought that was cheating, just like looking on the map for terrain that matches, until I saw someone on HN post "Challenge mode: 20 minutes and no zooming on the map". I was already doing that lol...
Sometimes I play with the "no-Google" rule, sometimes not. I am obsessed with this game. It's useful to study the Street View coverage map [1].
My best non-Google ever was being plopped down in front of a motel in Idaho City I'd stayed at; the second best was in front of the Miaoli train station in Taiwan. Both times, within 5m of the original location.
In my original playthrough (before they added duel mode), I moved the StreetView car a little bit, but not much. I didn't realize you could zoom the guess map until someone told me.
I understand not moving around the car and not Googling (and even not rotating though I consider it extreme) -- all that is part of the inherent challenge of finding out where you are from visual information.
But what's the point of not zooming in the guessing map (in the top right)? That's just the interface for giving the answer; and restricting zoom just makes it a pretty poor mouse accuracy game. If you know the exact position, you should be given the interface to mark it exactly.
Limiting the zoom function (top right, yes) is a good rule for a speed run. I think I did this playthrough in about 5 minutes. (I also discovered the variation by accident, as I posted below.) Altering the skill vs luck knob this way makes competitive mode a little more accessible to casual players.
And it's also a bit of a geography test. I guessed Moscow (wrongly, it was Minsk) and had to test my knowledge of where in the giant unlabeled shape of Russia that was. Similarly, pinpointing Montana out of all North America (with no country or state boundaries) is a lot harder than guessing "somewhere in Montana" when you can see the outline of Montana.
This was posted to Metafilter about a week ago. I have spent well over two hours everyday with it. I spent about 4 seconds on Tumblr in the last year so I guess geoguessr is worth the GPD of the entire planet.
I love the fact that you can explore really obscure parts of the worlds in a couple of seconds and it almost feels like you're there. It's a great way of getting a feel for a place before visiting too.
I also love maps in general so this is a really cool mixture.
Presumably this is to offload the need for storage for results. The "v=..." links contain Base64-encoded JSON data of all your guess coordinates, scores, etc. as well as that of the challenger.
I don't know if using Google is supposed to be within the spirit of the game, but it's incredibly satisfying to scrape together a few clues, and then home in on the exact spot. Playing it without Google is a lot more boring in my opinion.
The biggest problem is that South Africa, Mexico, and Australia all have extremely similar looking endless expanses of nothing.
that was pure luck. guessing the continent is fairly easy. guessing the country is a little bit tricky. But guessing a point in a 100 km diameter is pure luck :)
Yeah, the scoring should be made flatter between 50km and 500km and steeper above. Now there's bigger point difference between lucky shot in the right country and unlucky one than between unlucky shot in roughly right place and choosing wrong continent.
I only tried it briefly last night so I'm not sure about this, but probably (circumference of the earth) - (straight line* distance between guess and actual location)
A bit more experimentation should reveal the real answer.
*I'd have thought they'd use great circle, but no: it's just a big straight line on the map.
well done. perhaps check IP geo to know whether to show kms or miles. i kept getting the continent wrong. perhaps zoom the map to the right continent so I'm picking where on the continent it is vs where in the world. if you want to make some $, perhaps have some of the places be popular destination cities for my geo and after the guess, let folks click to "get there" over to hipmunk and get an affiliate fee
Reminds me of http://whereonthebluemarble.com/ which is also a fun game :) Except in Where on the Blue Marble, you guess the location of photos NASA has taken of the earth.
99 comments
[ 3.3 ms ] story [ 125 ms ] threadHoly long URL!
(I've been meaning to try this out since http://xkcd.com/1214/ brought its existence to my attention.)
We both bombed on South Africa and Australia, but I beat you for Utah and Russia :>
One of them was one I'd already had before, so it's obviously not completely random.
That said, it's a game where you pretty much make up your own rules.
My personal rule is absolutely no googling. I've been tempted to print out a list of all the phone area codes and take it with me in my virtual alien-ship-to-random-destinations since that is something I could actually do were I preparing for such a scenario.
Once I was dropped on a logging road in Canada. It took about a hour to hit a paved road and another 15 minutes to find a sign announcing the logging road ahead. I found a sign and googled it. Even that was wrong. I thought I was in Oregon but was wrong.
My best non-Google ever was being plopped down in front of a motel in Idaho City I'd stayed at; the second best was in front of the Miaoli train station in Taiwan. Both times, within 5m of the original location.
[1] https://support.google.com/maps/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answ...
http://bit.ly/1a4y8Ne
http://www.geoguessr.com/?s=eyJ0b3RhbFBvaW50cyI6MTA5MDgsInZl...
But what's the point of not zooming in the guessing map (in the top right)? That's just the interface for giving the answer; and restricting zoom just makes it a pretty poor mouse accuracy game. If you know the exact position, you should be given the interface to mark it exactly.
And it's also a bit of a geography test. I guessed Moscow (wrongly, it was Minsk) and had to test my knowledge of where in the giant unlabeled shape of Russia that was. Similarly, pinpointing Montana out of all North America (with no country or state boundaries) is a lot harder than guessing "somewhere in Montana" when you can see the outline of Montana.
I love the fact that you can explore really obscure parts of the worlds in a couple of seconds and it almost feels like you're there. It's a great way of getting a feel for a place before visiting too.
I also love maps in general so this is a really cool mixture.
I scored 17 349 but did allow myself to Google anything I could find (but for some places there are very few clues).
The urls should be shorter!
http://www.geoguessr.com?v=eyJ0b3RhbFBvaW50cyI6MTczNDksInZlc...
The biggest problem is that South Africa, Mexico, and Australia all have extremely similar looking endless expanses of nothing.
http://www.geoguessr.com?s=eyJ0b3RhbFBvaW50cyI6OTI0NywidmVyc...
Damn, I thought I'd beat you, but your last one was really close and made for all points I were ahead of you.
http://www.geoguessr.com?v=eyJ0b3RhbFBvaW50cyI6MTE2ODEsInZlc...
A bit more experimentation should reveal the real answer.
*I'd have thought they'd use great circle, but no: it's just a big straight line on the map.
I have to admit I found "Antibes" written on one of the posters and got 6k points just for one guess.
http://www.geoguessr.com?v=eyJ0b3RhbFBvaW50cyI6MzIzOTUsInZlc...
Yes. I cheated.. :P I couldn't stop myself to dig the code.
gg.GuessRoundCollection.makeGuess(gg.LatLngManager.currentLatLng) does the trick if anybody interested.