I think that this author's basic point is: "Don’t blame technology" for war deaths. Being against a specific war, or human conflict altogether is an entirely different matter.
Did he really just explain it by saving lives? I don't understand is he really that clouded? I mean can't you basically use that same silly reasoning to promote usage of nukes.
This seems like a really really bad post.
People are afraid of drones, because it's mass satellite imaging of people's personal lives being video captured.
But regardless people do like/show interest in the technology behind them, just not the blatent abuse the government is using them with.
Edit: Also what the heck gives with his cruddy designer site? I can't leave a comment unless I use twitter? What the. . .??
4 comments
[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 12.3 ms ] threadSome of us are actually anti-war, not just anti-drone.
This seems like a really really bad post.
People are afraid of drones, because it's mass satellite imaging of people's personal lives being video captured.
But regardless people do like/show interest in the technology behind them, just not the blatent abuse the government is using them with.
Edit: Also what the heck gives with his cruddy designer site? I can't leave a comment unless I use twitter? What the. . .??