Ask HN: Would you pay for Linux?
I've been tossing up the idea of a modern, developer-friendly distro with a nice UI, simple file hierarchy and good package management. Linux is built around being open, and almost all distro's are free (as in beer), so this might be an unusual thing to ask, but..
Would you pay for a Linux distro?
If so, what would you want to see in that distro? If not, why not?
7 comments
[ 3.2 ms ] story [ 25.6 ms ] threadI'm a desktop Linux user (Mint), and I find it to be quite developer-friendly, and it has a nice UI, and Debian has the best package management. So, personally, I'm not sold yet. :-)
A nice UI (similar to Unity), a for-profit app store, and drop support for 32-bit, and every other platform, except 64-bit and ARM, I hate so much backwards-compatibility like being able to run DOS on Windows 8 - I mean really?
I had a bunch of other ideas too, but these are all mainly behind-the-scenes work, no "concrete pain points" unfortunately I think.
But many would pay for services.
- First class 24/7 phone support.
- Pre-configured vertical software stacks (Eg. out the box VoIP server, or whatever)
- Option of off-site hosting.
Also could you explain off-site hosting?
Customers who don't want the hassle of having their own hardware.
You provide the hardware (in a datacentre) and rent out usage.
Would I ever pay for Linux distro? Quite possibly, but only if the software capabilities on the platform catches up with the competitors, for one I like playing games on my PC and as it currently stands I get sever performance losses and tons of graphical glitches which is a driver problem and as such not so much a distribution problem.
As for now I will continue running Linux on my laptop and servers, but my desktop will stay Windows for the foreseeable future.