65 comments

[ 2.9 ms ] story [ 145 ms ] thread
Thrilled to have watched this product and this team grow to this phase. This technology still amazes me.

Keep on killing it, guys!

(comment deleted)
Awesome job guys! Congrats!
Congrats guys, haven't heard of your platform before, definitely trying your real-time chat API shortly.

Looking into how your product compares with Parse...

Parse + Firebase == Unstoppable
How would that work?
These guys, they are amazing entrepreneurs. I don't say that lightly. Read about James and Andrew story in Haiti here http://darineich.com/startups-beanbags-earthquakes-and-fires...
Sounds like a good match with USV.
Thanks for the link, I didn't know about this story - I just received an email from James and now I feel even more honored. I am doing quite a lot with Firebase these days and this makes me want to use it even more.

Come to think of it, this surprises me.

Way to make me feel stupid for missing the seed :)
Firebase tried it so hard. Had opensource competitors and they still succeeded. Let this be a lesson to everyone else.

To a firebase hater, I know someone indirectly, whose product you bought and silenced. No good move, sir.

"Albert was the only investor we pitched who immediately made a Firebase app"

Now that's kind of cool for a VC!

He's one of a tiny minority of VC partners who actually write code. His site is http://continuations.com.
VCs code!?
The wiser ones seem to be developers themselves, creative problem solvers - at least at one point.
Many are former developers/entrepreneurs. Now they're VCs.

Maybe they wised up? :P)

Ha. Well, it's a natural progression I feel if you're an idea person - you end up with too many ideas than you could ever do on your own, so instead you can support teams that are highly passionate, and working on problems you (hopefully) understand.
You should take a minute read about the dude whose comment you replied to
Trivia: Chip Hazard is also one of the VC "bad guys" in Phil Greenspun's writing about the downfall of Ars Digita:

http://waxy.org/random/arsdigita/

Edit: I have no idea if that actually means something; it's just a name I remember from Greenspun's writing.

I'd take that article with a grain of salt. There's much omitted from that account and it happened 12 years ago.
What's your take on this? From the fact that you are pointing this out would you say he hasn't changed his spots? (I know nothing about him which is why I am asking..)
No idea at all. Edited the comment to make that clearer. I have zero professional exposure to any of these people.
On USV, my dealings have shown them to be incredibly hands off. Had a case where I made a deal suggestion to USV v. one of their famous investments. They said "I've thought they should do something like this for years, they won't but we respect that it's their decision". (Or something like that not an exact quote obviously..) Which is to bad (for me) because that investment recently had a big big announcement.
Chip Hazard is a great name, like something out of a 90's PC game, like Duke Nukem or something.
Another one I like is "John Hummer" from Hummer Winblad.

A memorable name can be an important asset. It can be a branding if it makes a strong positive impression. Of course like anything lacking one can be overcome once you gain a reputation. [1]

I know someone whose last name is "Bogus" believe me nobody ever forgets that name.

[1] Fred Wilson, Paul Graham

I love what these guys are doing and their technology. Congrats guys!
This is an incredible team.

The reason why I love seeing this is because these guys fall squarely in the category of work hard, iterate for years and get rewarded. This wasn't an overnight success. Rather, it's the result of an extremely smart team committed to making something great. I'm really excited to see what they come up with over the next few years.

Hell yeah :)
Loving the iOS SDK. That's 100% the way to go. Parse for real-time apps.
Backends are a thing of the past.
The Firebase team is amazing, congrats to them!
Yay! Just started using Firebase on a new project of mine a couple weeks ago, and loving it. I'm glad to see it's certain to be lasting :-)
Yep, very happy for you guys. If I wasn't working on my own stuff, Firebase would clearly be the very first startup I'd apply to work with.
I find it amazing that a company can get over $5 million without yet charging for their product. But then again, they kind of just did get people to pay for their product, just not customers/end users...
The investors clearly see a payoff down the road. It happens, you know.
And these investors are pretty good at seeing where things are going, understanding their value - and then supporting them to get there.
They're not. The baseline probability of profitability for these types of companies is incredibly small. However, the potential profit that you might make for any one of these companies is extremely high (usually by selling the company, not by the company's inherent ability to turn a profit) - so invest in multiple companies and if you're lucky the 'big one' will beat your losses many times over.
You don't think they have more prominent wins in their portfolio than most other VC portfolios out there?...
But what is the actual amount for "more"? If it's 20% success instead of 10% it's still not a good chance of success for the individual company.
VC funding, to my eyes, has a huge amount in common with Horse Racing.
Yes, though regression to the mean might suggest that they won't be so lucky in future.
Are people mostly developing full sites on Firebase, or just mini-apps?
I'm interested in the pricing decision. How big is the market for apps that are popular but free or unable to support the higher prices? I wonder if any thought went into a plan for them?
They have a free plan, the onus is on you to stay within those limits or upgrade.
Congratulations James and Andrew, from a long-time user of Envolve (the precursor to Firebase).
I like this investment a lot more than andreessen horowitz' Meteor investment.